Field of Consciousness explained

[Shin'Ar]

Shin'Ar, I believe you are sufficiently capable of grasping this. However, I perceive you are over-complicating things. This is extremely simple: THERE IS NO TIME.

Do not attempt to rationalize or over-analyze this now. I suggest you seek within in meditation with this focus in mind, and allow intuition to "show" you what is, how it is, why it is. Once you have perceived an ascertained this truth within the very heart of your being, you may then begin to extrapolate this concept of simultaneity into more "logical" approaches.

Firstly, however, seek to know it from within.

And do not feel discouraged, for even at the 7th density, the mind/body/spirit complex totality is seeking to learn the timelessness of the One Infinite Creator (hence, the Law of Foreverness—or Eternity, Timelessness, Infinity—, which is the principal lesson of the violet-ray vibratory spectrum).

PS: And remember, confusion precedes illumination (and illumination is a cumulative process throughout this octave of Creation).

Where in time lies dreams and the imagination?

I guess that is up to the dreamer/thinker.

One can imagine something in the future and it will always be in the future, likewise interpret dreams as the future or the past.

When one brings there imagination/dreams into the present moment they bridge the gap between body and soul with the mind. Imagination becomes something done in the moment to express the moment without the boundaries of the ego.

I imagine the mind as a bridge between body and soul, isn't it the mind of a being that develops? A rock has a body and a soul always but has no mind, an animal has a body and soul but a less aware mind and so the evolution continues. Creation could be viewed as a continuing developing mind into more and more complex body's with the soul balancing it out, so even though it seams the field of consciousness is gaining complexity it will always be balanced out with the oneness of the soul.

Siren, I have been meditating on such things for many years now and it is because of such intense considerations that I have developed the understanding that I now have.

So what I do now is try to keep an open mind to anything that might give me reason to change what I think I know.

It is not that I am confused or frustrated. this is how my life has been for a very long time. I seek understanding in the realm of new understanding.

---

When you apply the application of past, present and future to the flow of mere seconds, the greater grasping of the notion that such designations are constantly overlapping and circumstantially interchangeable arises. Our experience then begins to be more situated in a more spatially-oriented paradigm sustained by the embracing of a timeless awareness. Every present moment was once an unknown future possibility and as soon as you experienced the present moment, it became a past moment.

I think I see why you are thinking the way that you do.

you are seeing the process of continuing timeflow as an interchangeable singular event because in your experience time ceases to exist as a process of being.

as such you are able to perceive the instant as a stillness, which you have often referred to in describing your experience. In this still void, now is unaffected by the proceeding of time or any event. And so you can interchange possible future with resulting past in that now space of stilness void of procession.

But in that now reality of stillness, creation also ceases to proceed, and The All is nothing more than an instant in time, still and void of any and all interaction.

As such, what 'will be' is seen as imminent as soon as that instant passes, even though it is as yet unknown to the creation in process, and that iminence is what you define as future, whereas in the actual creation where time is a proceeding element of creation, that future cannot be held still, or considered to be a simultaneous event of present time.

Does this thinking get anywhere in your thoughts?

What you are saying is that the future which will be in a minute, becomes the present now as it happens, and then the past after it happens. and because of this procession of time, you define future events which may or may not take place as the same as that which has taken place.

But what of the unknown factor of their actual occurrence?

Your future definition cannot become present and past if it does not actually take place.

How do you factor that into the stillness of the instant where no action or creation proceeds into being?