He Who Was Not

[godwide_void]

zenmaster, by all means you have the freedom and liberty to rationalize away and speculate on the invalidity of the claims and circumstances of another, but I am certain that you are aware that the functioning of the minds of others, the spiritual relationship and connectivity one holds, the personal experience of reality of another, and the certain paradigms which govern said reality, even if the particular paradigms present in another's existence do not find inclusion or manifestation in yours, cannot be rationalized away or altered in any manner simply because another cynically muses upon their alleged falsehood.

Out of curiosity, I would also be interested in hearing what your perspective is on the nature of the Law of One Ra Material and its conception? Do you find little credence in it, or is it the prime standard which you place all other "channeled" material against and thus is the only such work which you believe to be valid and situated in truth? If so, what factors provide the basis for your conviction for believing the Ra Material to be truth in regards to it actually being a "channeled" work and what distinguishes it from other "channeled" material, as it seems to be a work which serves as the foundation for your philosophies.