He Who Was Not

[zenmaster]

Can you rephrase that?

---

I just didn't quite fully understand what you are getting at.

The utility of pre-rational info in general.

---

It's very much part of a characterization rather than an accusation. The latter is literally 'a charge or claim that someone has done something illegal or wrong'. To be clear it's not only not 'wrong', but acceptable. It's just a spew of more bullshit. And of course it applies to you as well, as if yours or any autopiloted, subconscious bias and delivery was one of absolute illumination and purity.

I find it extremely ironic that semantics is relegated to some petty disagreement, when it is *the* foundation of perceiving and then relating intuitive info.

That is because you believe that human intelligence is the only thing being shared in communication of information, and in that regard being able to speak a language without confusion over terms and definitions is essential for such a transfer of thoughts to be accurately received and transmitted.

What we are discussing goes far beyond human intellect and ability of perception.

We are discussing the designs built into creation that encompass much more than mere human communication and capability.

What you fail to realize is that what is being discussed are not things in themselves. Therefore the intuition is used to point in, what is perceived to be, their vaguely general direction. Prerational or unevaluated signposts are not part of conscious experience - it's still unconscious info - and therefore is a relatively poor aid in polarization. Don't mistake 'getting it' with 'reaching for it', or mere apprehension with comprehension.

When Ra talks about the planetary mind informing the conceptualizations of each entity, they are talking about prior and extant experience (actual memory or knowledge). That 'pool' is what provides the significant options here.