He Who Was Not

[βαθμιαίος]

What you are supposing is that experience of this sort is not to be considered experience unless it is rationally evaluated.

I think in Ra's terms it would be considered catalyst rather than experience.

So at what point does a field reach the point of being able to rationally evaluate to the degree that would meet what you define as experience?

When it begins third density, maybe.

I do not understand your effort to declare a degree of ability somewhere within this natural effort.

Ra mentions "the acuity of the processes of catalyst and experience." In fact, maybe the quote would be useful here:

92.34 ...each potentiation which has been reached for by the Matrix is recorded by the Matrix but experienced by the Significator. The experience of the Significator of this potentiated activity is of course dependent upon the acuity of its processes of Catalyst and Experience.

I wonder if some of the disagreement has to do with a confusion about or failure to distinguish between the processes of experience and signification (is that a word?!).