He Who Was Not

[Shin'Ar]

What you are supposing is that experience of this sort is not to be considered experience unless it is rationally evaluated.

I think in Ra's terms it would be considered catalyst rather than experience.

So at what point does a field reach the point of being able to rationally evaluate to the degree that would meet what you define as experience?

When it begins third density, maybe.

I do not understand your effort to declare a degree of ability somewhere within this natural effort.

Ra mentions "the acuity of the processes of catalyst and experience." In fact, maybe the quote would be useful here:

92.34 ...each potentiation which has been reached for by the Matrix is recorded by the Matrix but experienced by the Significator. The experience of the Significator of this potentiated activity is of course dependent upon the acuity of its processes of Catalyst and Experience.

I wonder if some of the disagreement has to do with a confusion about or failure to distinguish between the processes of experience and signification (is that a word?!).

Thanks Greek,

That did help somewhat.

It probably is more semantic than anything else.

What I am reading here is the matrix is The All, the significator is the fragment. The potentiation cannot be recorded into The All, until experienced by the fragment. The acuity of its processes of catalyst and experience simply means its degree of evolved being.

So basically it is stating that every possibility reached for by/within The All cannot actually be added as stored memory until it is actually experienced by the fragment, OR put another way,

It is the fragmented experience alone which establishes the memory of The All, or that which we would call creation.

This unequivocally acknowledges the necessity of the One to experience creation via the fragment. Which supports what I have been supposing in that the fragment is not the creator, but the process of It.