Carla's Explanation of All

[Patrick]

Strange after all the discussion around All is One, and the many efforts to suggest that it means we are the Creator, that now that Carla has made her understanding clear no one wants to tackle it further.

I like giving my opinion. But lately, I started refraining from doing so when I do not agree. "What good will my opinion do if I do not agree?" I told myself.

I have not heard the radio show as yet. Sounds interesting.

My feeling on this issue (original source and us) is that we could think of it as fractal geometry, or as a holographic plate.

If you cut a holographic plate in 2, the entire image is still on each piece. You can cut it again and again, and the entire image is still on the cut piece no matter how small it gets. Yet as the piece is divided, the image becomes more indistinct. In this way, we are part of the original source, and the original source.

Fractals are similar: if you look at broccoli, you will find the entire stalk is repeated pattern-wise in each flowerette, and within the flowerette you will see tiny flowerettes of the exact same pattern; and this repeats and repeats. Inversely, this is how the broccoli grows, in this fractal way, which is related mathematically to the fibonacci sequence.

Indeed.

"Each piece of a hologram contains a particular perspective of the image, but it includes the entire object."

At the University of Paris, a research team led by physicist Alain Aspect performed what may turn out to be one of the most important experiments of the 20th century. Bohm believes the reason subatomic particles are able to remain in contact with one another regardless of the distance separating them is not because they are sending some sort of mysterious signal back and forth, but because their separateness is an illusion. He argues that at some deeper level of reality such particles are not individual entities, but are actually extensions of the same fundamental something.