Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Community Olio Prejudice, science, etc.

    Thread: Prejudice, science, etc.


    Parsons (Offline)

    Citizen of Eternity
    Posts: 2,857
    Threads: 84
    Joined: Nov 2011
    #13
    09-27-2012, 11:52 PM
    He does actually have mention of quantum physics experiments in his aforementioned book. He lists the very few experiments published in scientific journals, which found successful results (chance was expected at 50% on one experiment, but got a 60% hit rate). There were hundreds of replications of the same trials published in the journals, but sadly were filtered out due to the extreme taboo of this phenomenon in the scientific world. Mainstream science blacklists telepathy/clairvoyance scientific trials from getting into peer reviewed journals, which I have no doubt is the reason for your bias and your uninformed skeptical stance of thinking there isn't any data. There is overwhelming mountains of data for a whole range of experiments, which when compiled into meta data have odds against chance that range from 20-1(the threshold of science to believe there is an 'interesting effect' going on) to several trillion-1. Radin is even fair(always approaches everything with the scientific method) and talks about unsuccessful scientific trials and wrote the book from as a least biased standpoint as possible.

    But apparently not all realize educational institutions are just as corrupt as governments and banks. The larger and higher profile the institution, the more potential for corruption. A prime example would be all the peer reviewed stuff getting all the super harmful pharmaceuticals pushed on us by doctors. Ra/Q'uo said that most of them cause more harm than benefit while only treating symptoms, not fixing the root cause. Yet the same pharmaceuticals are considered relatively safe by peer reviewed articles. I hate to sound like a conspiracy monger, but it totally makes logical sense for 'TPTB' to ostracize any talk of telepathy; as if people realized this, many more people would use this information to their advantage and try to apply it to their everyday life. What if you could tell if a politician was completely lying to you about something? They would lose all their power over the half-asleep masses.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-26-2012, 08:42 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 09-28-2012, 08:43 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Siren - 09-28-2012, 10:21 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 09-28-2012, 11:37 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 09-29-2012, 02:30 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-29-2012, 08:14 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-29-2012, 09:13 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-30-2012, 01:31 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-29-2012, 09:28 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-30-2012, 03:07 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Shin'Ar - 09-30-2012, 07:27 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 09-30-2012, 10:49 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 09-30-2012, 11:33 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 10-01-2012, 12:47 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-01-2012, 02:46 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by zenmaster - 10-02-2012, 09:56 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Parsons - 10-03-2012, 07:06 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 10-03-2012, 12:21 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-03-2012, 12:55 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 10-03-2012, 01:33 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-03-2012, 01:43 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-02-2012, 09:27 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 10-02-2012, 09:49 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-02-2012, 09:53 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Cyan - 10-02-2012, 10:09 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-02-2012, 03:11 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Shin'Ar - 10-02-2012, 06:21 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 10-02-2012, 11:06 AM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Parsons - 10-02-2012, 03:13 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Patrick - 10-03-2012, 01:06 PM
    RE: Prejudice, science, etc. - by Tenet Nosce - 10-03-2012, 01:19 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 01:46 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Patrick - 09-26-2012, 02:24 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 03:19 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Cyan - 09-26-2012, 03:35 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Patrick - 09-26-2012, 03:39 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 06:33 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-26-2012, 07:44 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-26-2012, 08:48 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by hogey11 - 09-26-2012, 11:42 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-27-2012, 11:12 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-27-2012, 08:27 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-27-2012, 11:52 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-28-2012, 12:00 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Parsons - 09-28-2012, 01:19 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by zenmaster - 09-29-2012, 02:19 PM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Cyan - 09-28-2012, 01:32 AM
    RE: Abrupt vs gradual harvest - by Shin'Ar - 09-28-2012, 06:42 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode