04-07-2017, 10:48 AM
(04-06-2017, 03:43 PM)kevn Wrote: Do you know what a tesseract is?
You cannot represent it with your intellect. Einstein could not either were he alive. If all of humanity was meditating all at once together and trying to mentally represent what a tesseract is, it would fail.
And here you are trying to intellectually represent "intelligent infinity", which is like a tesseract³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³²³³²³
Good luck
I think I'll stick with the rocks in "non-intellectual 1D" and leave you to your "later stages"...
Intellectually one can extrapolate what a tesseract is. Einstein probably would have made a thought experiment to do so, but he certainly would have tried to get out of our box of 3D limitations. And he probably would have prefaced with a scene from Flatland.
I agree that experiencing 4D would certainly be different than trying to intellectually understand it. Flatland gives us an interesting take on this idea when A. Sphere pulls A. Square out of his 2-dimensional world into the 3-dimensional world, and still A. Square did not understand, though it changed him. I think the same could be said of meditation, when one gets a feeling of being beyond 3D—but we are really too bogged down here I think to really understand movement in higher existences.
As long as humans separate things, and deny the part each aspect of existence plays, there will be nonunderstanding. Ego has its place and plays an important role in 3D. 3D is not something to do while waiting for 4D. Its a layered experience, so each layer is important. It's more about balance. One doesn't want ego to take over, but I don't think it's wise to discard it either. Just as I don't think it's wise to say we are "not bodies, we are spirits." We are bodies too, while we are here experiencing 3D.
It's more about inclusion in my opinion, of everything. Instead of throwing parts out as nonessential, just keep adding things in. The parts that don't serve will naturally recede or fall away.