06-29-2021, 09:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-29-2021, 09:37 PM by Louisabell.)
(05-26-2021, 11:21 AM)Louisabell Wrote: I interpret this to mean that Patton must of increased in his ability to perceive a higher intensity of light/love, thereby increasing his polarity. However, due to still acting in bellicose ways in light of his raised consciousness, more karma ended up being accrued to him that would need to be balanced by further third-density experience (thereby reducing his odds for harvestability). This being due to the Law of Responsibility. When we know to do better, we must do better. So as Patton progressed in his life, he acted less out of innocence and more from immoral decisions that he consciously made (in seeing more love yet fighting on).
In reply to myself, I wanted to add on that on recently coming across passage 35.1 again from the LOO, I realised that the same thing may have happened to Eleanor Roosevelt:
Ra Wrote:35.1 ... I am Ra ... This entity polarized continuously in a positive fashion in the universal sense while, in a less universal sense, developing a pattern of what may be called karma; this karma having to do with inharmonious relationship distortions with the mate/teacher.
So, looks like karma is not strictly tied to one's ability to polarize, yet can be tied to the concept of one's harvestability. The logical consistency of the LOO never ceases to amaze me.
Thanks for all the good times B4! Reach me here: lloubbell234@yahoo.com