The mysterious nature of time

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

My tributes to the enterprising human spirit!

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

80.15 Questioner: The only obvious significant difference, I believe, between the positive and negative adepts in using this shuttle is the way they polarize. Is there a relationship between the archetypes of the spirit and whether the polarization is either positive or negative? Is, for instance, the positive calling through the sixteenth archetype and the negative calling through the fifteenth archetype? I am very confused about this and I imagine that that question is either poor or meaningless. Can you answer that?

Ra: I am Ra. It is a challenge to answer such a query, for there is some confusion in its construction. However, we shall attempt to speak upon the subject.

The adept, whether positive or negative, has the same Matrix. The Potentiator is also identical. Due to the Catalyst of each adept the adept may begin to pick and choose that into which it shall look further. The Experience of the Spirit, that which you have called the Moon, is then, by far, the more manifest of influences upon the polarity of the adept. Even the most unhappy of experiences, shall we say, which seem to occur in the Catalyst of the adept, seen from the viewpoint of the spirit, may, with the discrimination possible in shadow, be worked with until light equaling the light of brightest noon descends upon the adept and positive or service-to-others illumination has occurred. The service-to-self adept will satisfy itself with the shadows and, grasping the light of day, will toss back the head in grim laughter, preferring the darkness.

Here is a greatly inspiring story from the world of real human affairs, which beautifully illustrates the above attitude that may help in generating positive illumination!

Boston bombings destroy dancer's foot, but not her spirit

Take a bow, Adrianne Haslet-Davis! You are a genuine inspiration.

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Hototo]

You do realize that we are inside the black hole of the milky way galaxy and what we see as the dot is the singularity but is also the exterior (exit from reality) point of the universe.

The one great central sun. For us the Sun, for the scientists the central black hole.

[Confused]

You do realize that we are inside the black hole of the milky way galaxy and what we see as the dot is the singularity but is also the exterior (exit from reality) point of the universe.

The one great central sun. For us the Sun, for the scientists the central black hole.

I do not understand, NS.

[Hototo]

You do realize that we are inside the black hole of the milky way galaxy and what we see as the dot is the singularity but is also the exterior (exit from reality) point of the universe.

The one great central sun. For us the Sun, for the scientists the central black hole.

I do not understand, NS.

One day maybe, but for now I'll have to say no.

That is to say. I'm rather sorry but I cant explain more deeply than that at the moment

[Dinko]

You do realize that we are inside the black hole of the milky way galaxy and what we see as the dot is the singularity but is also the exterior (exit from reality) point of the universe.

The one great central sun. For us the Sun, for the scientists the central black hole.

I do not understand, NS.

One day maybe, but for now I'll have to say no.

That is to say. I'm rather sorry but I cant explain more deeply than that at the moment

me too

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Confused]

[Meerie]

Here is more info about the hurricane on Saturn:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassin...30429.html

I especially like the false color pic of the vortex, that looks like a rose

[Confused]

Here is more info about the hurricane on Saturn:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassin...30429.html

I especially like the false color pic of the vortex, that looks like a rose

Hello, thank you, Meerie!

---

[Confused]

34.14 Questioner: Can you give me the same type of information that we’ve been working on now with respect to the self relationship with war and rumors of war?

Ra: I am Ra. You may see this in relationship to your gadgets. This war and self relationship is a fundamental perception of the maturing entity. There is a great chance to accelerate in whatever direction is desired. One may polarize negatively by assuming bellicose attitudes for whatever reason. One may find oneself in the situation of war and polarize somewhat towards the positive activating orange, yellow, and then green by heroic, if you may call them this, actions taken to preserve the mind/body/spirit complexes of other-selves.

Finally, one may polarize very strongly third ray* by expressing the principle of universal love at the total expense of any distortion towards involvement in bellicose actions. In this way the entity may become a conscious being in a very brief span of your time/space. This may be seen to be what you would call a traumatic progression. It is to be noted that among your entities a large percentage of all progression has as catalyst, trauma.

* This should be fourth ray. Ra corrected the mistake in the next answer.

The Paradox of Trauma

[Hototo]

Truly the Paradox of Trauma.

I find that the truly infinite thing about the universe isn't that you can live forever, which you can, but rather, that you can make almost any choice and STILL make the right choices to live forever.

Inherent in that living forever (as this personality or "identified self") is that you will live forever as both Creator and separate from creator. That you will become an infinite co-creator.

That I find so interesting.

Trauma, regardless of what it is, when it is caused or how deep it runs, does not prevent infinity and immortality as an individual, quite the opposite, it is one of the few things which enables it. Being stuck in this "loop of karma", make it a pretty loop with changing colors and patterns and you'll be glad to be "stuck" in it.

To quote something once said to me: If you are a prisoner *of love, must you escape into solitude.

Edit: *I could have sworn I wrote "of love" the first time around too but it wasn't there when I posted so the first version was "If you are a prisoner, must you escape into solitude." while the actual one should read "If you are a prisoner of love, must you escape into solitude" or in this case, referring to the impersonal "one" "If one is a prisoner of love..." But I suppose any kind of prisoner really. Is a prison of sociability preferable to a isolation of freedom.