Is Creator a Concept?

[AnthroHeart]

Is the One Infinite Creator a concept?
Or are concepts limited?
Is Creator greater than a concept?
What's a better word to describe Creator besides infinite and concept?

If Creator is a concept, then it's something you can conceptualize. If it's beyond that, you wouldn't be able to conceptualize it.

Are there things that cannot be conceptualized?

Or is a thing by definition a concept?

Is Creator a thing? Or is it beyond "thing"?

Can you conceptualize Infinity?

[Agua]

removed

[Agua]

removed

[AnthroHeart]

But you can easily tell them apart: the creator is the one with the long white beard

It's Gandalf!

[Minyatur]

Creator is what is.

Thoughts and concepts are abstractions of what is.

[loostudent]

The philosopher Immanuel Kant introduced the concept (or meta-concept?) of the "thing-in-itself" (ding an sich):

And we indeed, rightly considering objects of sense as mere appearances, confess thereby that they are based upon a thing in itself, though we know not this thing as it is in itself, but only know its appearances, viz., the way in which our senses are affected by this unknown something.

[Agua]

removed

[AnthroHeart]

The philosopher Immanuel Kant introduced the concept (or meta-concept?) of the "thing-in-itself" (ding an sich):

And we indeed, rightly considering objects of sense as mere appearances, confess thereby that they are based upon a thing in itself, though we know not this thing as it is in itself, but only know its appearances, viz., the way in which our senses are affected by this unknown something.

The implications of this whole thread (or subject) for spiritual seeking are pretty interesting, dont you think?

Yes, it feels to me like the most intelligent question I have ever asked.

They say that you can tell someone's level of development by the questions they ask. And probably by the answers they give too.

Just putting it out there. Not to brag or boast or anything.
The path before me lies infinite in extent.

Maybe it's knowing when not to ask a question that shows maturity. I'm glad I asked this one though. There is so much insight here.

[OpalE]

"Transcendental concept" feels more appropriate to me.

Something to "step through" into understanding past our own capacity, rather than limit and define.

Unfortunately, i think it's treated like a concept more often than not tho ... becoming an extension of self for the one conceiving, dividing the infinite into a false finite, and creating an opposite that is neither necessary nor inherently true.

[Agua]

removed

[AnthroHeart]

It is like Bill Harris of Centerpointe says, "The map is not the territory."

[Agua]

removed

[Infinite Unity]

Is the One Infinite Creator a concept?
Or are concepts limited?
Is Creator greater than a concept?
What's a better word to describe Creator besides infinite and concept?

If Creator is a concept, then it's something you can conceptualize. If it's beyond that, you wouldn't be able to conceptualize it.

Are there things that cannot be conceptualized?

Or is a thing by definition a concept?

Is Creator a thing? Or is it beyond "thing"?

Can you conceptualize Infinity?

The One Infinite Creator; has dual meaning. There is The One Infinite Creator:Love/Light. And There is The Creator/The One Infinite Creator; The One emitting/generating Love/Light.

To “envision” The Creators experience. I believe looking at it from a cellular view point shows clarity. Your cells partake in a life, it lives in a community, has a routine, and communicates with portions of its environment. Now try imagining this cell understanding it is apart of a larger whole. Yet even if it understood the environmental whole it is apart of, would it still understand the experience “we” partake in? (Human life).

Then look around you, and understand at a similar level: you are just like that cell. You live in a community, have a routine, and communicate to portions of your environment. Yet you are apart of a larger whole. What experience do we offer the opportunity, even though we don’t even know? God is similar: the whole universe, and everything makes up God, and who knows what Gods experience truly is?

[Aion]

1.7 Questioner: [The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the tape recorder to be recorded.]

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.

That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.
In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

It does not matter where you look or what you see, what you think, what you imagine, and in the infinite silence, there is the Creator.

[Infinite]

28.1 QUESTIONER I may be backtracking a little bit and make a few false starts today because I think we are at possibly the most important part of what we are doing in trying to make it apparent, through questioning, how everything is one, and how it comes from one intelligent infinity. This is difficult for me to do, so please bear with my errors in questioning.

The concept that I have right now of the process, using both what you have told me and some of Dewey Larson’s material having to do with the physics of the process— I have the concept that intelligent infinity expands outward from all locations everywhere. It expands outward in every direction uniformly like the surface of a balloon or a bubble, expanding outward from every point everywhere. It expands outward at what’s called unit velocity, or the velocity of light. This is Larson’s idea of the progression of what he calls space/time. Is this concept correct?

RA I am Ra. This concept is incorrect, as is any concept of the one intelligent infinity. This concept is correct in the context of one particular Logos, or Love, or focus of this Creator which has chosen Its, shall we say, natural laws and ways of expressing them mathematically and otherwise.

The one undifferentiated intelligent infinity, unpolarized, full and whole, is the macrocosm of the mystery-clad being. We are messengers of the Law of One. Unity, at this approximation of understanding, cannot be specified by any physics but only be activated, or potentiated, intelligent infinity due to the catalyst of free will. This may be difficult to accept. However, the understandings we have to share begin and end in mystery.