The Antithesis of the Law of One

[Ashim]

...must exist, 
So what is it?
"Wie lautet das Gesetz"? §

[ada]

the law of two

[Minyatur]

the law of many

[Ashim]

the law of two

Two is a crowd.
Try again.

[Ashim]

the law of many

[Ashim]

the law of many

[ada]

there is only you, and the other-self, thus, two

[Ashim]

There is no 'Law of Many'

"That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity."

[ada]

Precisely why you can't have more than One, you're so, dense.

[Ashim]

Precisely why you can't have more than One, you're so, dense.

I am the original thought.

The Law of Acquisition.

[Minyatur]

There is no 'Law of Many'

"That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity."

Then we could perhaps consider if the One is anything of itself without being many.

[ada]

[Patrick]

The Law is One...


 

[tamaryn]

Duality,
The One is Many the Many is One;
thus illusion (many) is reality (one) and reality illusion

[ada]

duality is indeed so (harmony), but how can there be many if it is the same thought?

[APeacefulWarrior]

Who says it must have an antithesis?

[Nau7ik]

the law of two

In the Qabalistic system, the World of Shells or the Qlipoth, is the tree of death, the antithesis of Unity. For in the tree of death, Kether is not one but two, Satan and Molech.

For the negative, duality is important. The whole premise is based on separate, many, superiority, etc. Again, symbolizing the unity as a duality. Perversion of what is into what is not.

The tree of life consists of 10 principles, whereas the Qlipoth are 11 in number.

I think the Qabalah is a great system for exploring one's inner universe.

As above, So Below.

**edit - There is only the Law of One, but from the perspective of the negative polarity, separation and many ness are central ideas. The left hand path is sometimes called the path of that which is not.

[rva_jeremy]

The Friendly Suggestion of One?

[outerheaven]

the |aw of ONE ::enthusiastically points thumbs at self::

[Nicholas]

If we are going to reduce The Law of One down to a thesis, then The Law of Zero would seem antithetical to me.


"This light of love was made to have in its occurrences of being certain characteristics, among them the infinite whole paradoxically described by the straight line" - 13.9

[AnthroHeart]

Does un-awareness exist? Maybe in Infinity.

[Chandlersdad]

...must exist, 
So what is it?
"Wie lautet das Gesetz"? §

Predatory capitalism and the GOP official platform? :-/

[Ashim]

It would seem that the Law of One itself is paradoxical, or true to both polarities, up to the point in mid 6th density that Ra describes.

I feel that I may well be at this very threshold and having a conversation with the 'other'.

In sixth density, the density of unity, the positive and negative paths must needs take in each other for all now must be seen as love/light and light/love. This is not difficult for the positive polarity, which sends love and light to all other-selves. It is difficult enough for service-to-self polarized entities that at some point the negative polarity is abandoned.

[Nau7ik]

If we are going to reduce The Law of One down to a thesis, then The Law of Zero would seem antithetical to me.


"This light of love was made to have in its occurrences of being certain characteristics, among them the infinite whole paradoxically described by the straight line" - 13.9

0=1
Division by infinity equals zero, and division of zero equals infinity.

[Minyatur]

It would seem that the Law of One itself is paradoxical, or true to both polarities, up to the point in mid 6th density that Ra describes.

I feel that I may well be at this very threshold and having a conversation with the 'other'.

In sixth density, the density of unity, the positive and negative paths must needs take in each other for all now must be seen as love/light and light/love. This is not difficult for the positive polarity, which sends love and light to all other-selves. It is difficult enough for service-to-self polarized entities that at some point the negative polarity is abandoned.

I don't really get this logic.

I don't see how polarities merging makes the Law of One paradoxal, polarities merge (in one's understanding of itself) because they never are truly separated and reflect a unified facet of infinity, which is Love.

[Ashim]

It would seem that the Law of One itself is paradoxical, or true to both polarities, up to the point in mid 6th density that Ra describes.

I feel that I may well be at this very threshold and having a conversation with the 'other'.

In sixth density, the density of unity, the positive and negative paths must needs take in each other for all now must be seen as love/light and light/love. This is not difficult for the positive polarity, which sends love and light to all other-selves. It is difficult enough for service-to-self polarized entities that at some point the negative polarity is abandoned.

I don't really get this logic.

I don't see how polarities merging makes the Law of One paradoxal, polarities merge (in one's understanding of itself) because they never are truly separated and reflect a unified facet of infinity, which is Love.

I was simply observing the fact that the Law of One is essentially also the 'doctrine' of the negative polarity up till mid 6th density.
Don't forget that it was Ra who made the whole Illuminati thing possible.
I believe it's actually 'paradoxical', unless you are conversing in German.