07-16-2010, 02:07 AM
@Bring4th_GLB - The following are my personal observations to the point that you highlighted.
As far as my understanding is concerned, it would not be possible to eliminate fear, control, or hatred from the this galactic logoic system (of which our earth is a constituent), as they are integral tools of the negative polarity. It is not the tools that we can purge, but the unintended consequences flowing from the usage of those tools that can be checked under a STO paradigm. I will use a quote of Ra that I used earlier in this thread to communicate my observations to fairyfarmgirl. In session 90, Ra makes the following quote -
"It is correct that the Logos designed Its experiment to attempt to achieve the greatest possible opportunities for polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos. This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced."
Please note that the grasping thumb was designed by the logos to encourage or quicken polarisation; but apparently the logos did not envisage that it would be used for activities such as warfare. May be an activity called 'warfare' as we know it did not exist as a concept in actuality at the 'time' of the design making. Now why did the logos choose "the life-form with the grasping thumb"? A clue is present in Session 19. Please consider the following Ra quote -
"..., the weakening of the physical vehicle, as you call it, was designed to distort entities towards a predisposition to deal with each other." In the same session (19), Ra provides an indication as to why the weakening of the physical body was necessary for the third density. In Ra's words -
"The third-density mind was capable of processing information in such a way as to think abstractly and in what could be termed “useless” ways, in the sense of survival. This is the primary requisite.
There are other important ingredients: the necessity for a weaker physical vehicle to encourage the use of the mind, the development of the already present awareness of the social complex. These also being necessary: the further development of physical dexterity in the sense of the hand, as you call this portion of your body complex."
Thus the logos in order to encourage the use of the mind for third density purposes, weakened the physical complex (the veil). The Logos also inculcated physical dexterity (through the grasping thumb) for a reason that to me is obscured in the verbiage of the aforementioned Ra quote. However, from the earlier quote from session 90, it is clear (in my opinion) that the logos did not envisage that its grand design would lead to extremely painful material consequences such as warfare.
Thus the STO subset of the human population could possibly practice the "one discipline or denial of the unwanted portion as an appropriate part of the self is taken through the tree of mind down through the trunk to subconscious levels where the connection is made and thus the body, mind, and spirit, then in unison, express denial of the excess or unwanted spiritual or mental material as part of the entity". The unwanted portion is not the basic tools of negativity such as hatred or control, but the unintended consequences like extreme physical torture of entities. At least extreme physical torture of entities wherein that event is a random catalyst; for it can be argued that some entities may program physical torture for themselves under their own free will as part of their learning or as a karmic restitution. Even if through our focused will, we are able to avert random physical torture of one individual in this complex world by rejecting that phenomenon as "excess or unwanted material" (session 90), it would live up to Ra's simple message -
"To serve one is to serve all." (session 1)
Quote:But how would a collective purge something like fear, or control, or hatred?
As far as my understanding is concerned, it would not be possible to eliminate fear, control, or hatred from the this galactic logoic system (of which our earth is a constituent), as they are integral tools of the negative polarity. It is not the tools that we can purge, but the unintended consequences flowing from the usage of those tools that can be checked under a STO paradigm. I will use a quote of Ra that I used earlier in this thread to communicate my observations to fairyfarmgirl. In session 90, Ra makes the following quote -
"It is correct that the Logos designed Its experiment to attempt to achieve the greatest possible opportunities for polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos. This form of expression of hostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced."
Please note that the grasping thumb was designed by the logos to encourage or quicken polarisation; but apparently the logos did not envisage that it would be used for activities such as warfare. May be an activity called 'warfare' as we know it did not exist as a concept in actuality at the 'time' of the design making. Now why did the logos choose "the life-form with the grasping thumb"? A clue is present in Session 19. Please consider the following Ra quote -
"..., the weakening of the physical vehicle, as you call it, was designed to distort entities towards a predisposition to deal with each other." In the same session (19), Ra provides an indication as to why the weakening of the physical body was necessary for the third density. In Ra's words -
"The third-density mind was capable of processing information in such a way as to think abstractly and in what could be termed “useless” ways, in the sense of survival. This is the primary requisite.
There are other important ingredients: the necessity for a weaker physical vehicle to encourage the use of the mind, the development of the already present awareness of the social complex. These also being necessary: the further development of physical dexterity in the sense of the hand, as you call this portion of your body complex."
Thus the logos in order to encourage the use of the mind for third density purposes, weakened the physical complex (the veil). The Logos also inculcated physical dexterity (through the grasping thumb) for a reason that to me is obscured in the verbiage of the aforementioned Ra quote. However, from the earlier quote from session 90, it is clear (in my opinion) that the logos did not envisage that its grand design would lead to extremely painful material consequences such as warfare.
Thus the STO subset of the human population could possibly practice the "one discipline or denial of the unwanted portion as an appropriate part of the self is taken through the tree of mind down through the trunk to subconscious levels where the connection is made and thus the body, mind, and spirit, then in unison, express denial of the excess or unwanted spiritual or mental material as part of the entity". The unwanted portion is not the basic tools of negativity such as hatred or control, but the unintended consequences like extreme physical torture of entities. At least extreme physical torture of entities wherein that event is a random catalyst; for it can be argued that some entities may program physical torture for themselves under their own free will as part of their learning or as a karmic restitution. Even if through our focused will, we are able to avert random physical torture of one individual in this complex world by rejecting that phenomenon as "excess or unwanted material" (session 90), it would live up to Ra's simple message -
"To serve one is to serve all." (session 1)