03-09-2019, 10:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2019, 11:42 PM by redchartreuse.)
(03-09-2019, 02:44 AM)flofrog Wrote: I could be so wrong, but I think in the clear vision of Ra, anything said or intended to someone has to not infringe their free will. When you read Ra for a while, you are struck at how delicately he will do anything to not imply pressure on any statement so that any entity has complete free choice and comes, in time to its own state of mind, for her/his own decision ont he subject. In other terms, to have someone in your sphere of influence is not enough to receive service. The ultimate decision has to come from the entity after her/his own meandering thought process. In that it rejoins the Buddhist system where you have no right to enter the sacred sphere surrounding an entity.
I think Ra makes that clear numerous times. Which is why I like Ra so much, lol
We are entitled to service to others, if we so choose, but this comes with limitations.
Well we were talking about this quite a bit in another thread, and I wondered the same as you. However, I was swayed to the opinion that we are not to hold ourselves to the same standard as Ra, since we're not sixth density beings walking among humanity as those who would be seen as gods, or claiming to have been such in the past.