01-13-2011, 11:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-13-2011, 11:16 PM by turtledude23.)
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/fami...le1864813/
This article made me kind of angry. So many parents don't respect their children's free will, Asian parents in particular seem even more oppressive, Asia in general seems very oppressive and conformist. Are Asians the primary descendants of Mars or Maldek? That region of the world seems alot more STS than any other part. Even modern "developed" countries in Asia are very oppressive (South Korea, Japan, not to mention China). In regards to this topic Ra said something along the lines (can't find the quote) of: don't look at skin pigmentation, look at the philosophy regarding self and other-self in the society. Just a few months ago I learned that Asian countries tend to be "collectivistic" societies which means rather than the needs of the individual they focus on the needs of a group like a family, which sounds more STO on the surface but is actually more STS because every group has a leader, in the case of an Asian family usually the father, and the authority of that leader is unquestioned - free will is ignored. It reminds me of this:
It's just disgusting, so many parents in North America want their children to be "successful", in other words: make alot of money. Do people not understand money doesn't equal happiness? In fact people with more money than they need tend to be more unhappy. If someone of their own free will wanted to be a lawyer that works 12 hours a day at super stressful job so they can make $300,000 a year and buy shiny cars then that's their choice. But when parents force their children to pursue that career and try to mold their behaviour to reach that end from a young age then it angers me.
This article made me kind of angry. So many parents don't respect their children's free will, Asian parents in particular seem even more oppressive, Asia in general seems very oppressive and conformist. Are Asians the primary descendants of Mars or Maldek? That region of the world seems alot more STS than any other part. Even modern "developed" countries in Asia are very oppressive (South Korea, Japan, not to mention China). In regards to this topic Ra said something along the lines (can't find the quote) of: don't look at skin pigmentation, look at the philosophy regarding self and other-self in the society. Just a few months ago I learned that Asian countries tend to be "collectivistic" societies which means rather than the needs of the individual they focus on the needs of a group like a family, which sounds more STO on the surface but is actually more STS because every group has a leader, in the case of an Asian family usually the father, and the authority of that leader is unquestioned - free will is ignored. It reminds me of this:
Quote:87.7 ...
The relationship of such an entity [5d negative] to fourth-density negative entities is one of the more powerful and the less powerful. The negative path posits slavery of the less powerful as a means of learning the desire to serve the self to the extent that the will is brought to bear. It is in this way that polarity is increased in the negative sense. Thus fourth-density entities are willing slaves of such a fifth-density entity, there being no doubt whatsoever of the relative power of each.
87.8 Questioner: A reflection of this could be seen in our density in many of those leaders who instigate war and have followers who support, in total conviction that the direction of conquest is correct. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. Any organization which demands obedience without question upon the basis of relative power is functioning according to the above described plan.
It's just disgusting, so many parents in North America want their children to be "successful", in other words: make alot of money. Do people not understand money doesn't equal happiness? In fact people with more money than they need tend to be more unhappy. If someone of their own free will wanted to be a lawyer that works 12 hours a day at super stressful job so they can make $300,000 a year and buy shiny cars then that's their choice. But when parents force their children to pursue that career and try to mold their behaviour to reach that end from a young age then it angers me.