12-24-2012, 10:52 AM
What Cutter misses in his speculations is the Mystery of the sublime paradox he acknowledges.
When he begins to speak of alternate universes, as finite returns, he mistakenly redefines infinity as being finite.
We cannot have both. We cannot call it a paradox and then begin to redefine everything to meet an antithesis of that mistaken definition.
All of this discussion about space-time continuum breaks apart in the acknowledging of the paradox.
Until the paradox is no longer a part of the equation, that equation must remain unsolved, however provocative and intelligent the attempts may sound.
Infinity has no conclusion, and remains hidden in the Mystery to come.
When he begins to speak of alternate universes, as finite returns, he mistakenly redefines infinity as being finite.
We cannot have both. We cannot call it a paradox and then begin to redefine everything to meet an antithesis of that mistaken definition.
All of this discussion about space-time continuum breaks apart in the acknowledging of the paradox.
Until the paradox is no longer a part of the equation, that equation must remain unsolved, however provocative and intelligent the attempts may sound.
Infinity has no conclusion, and remains hidden in the Mystery to come.