06-06-2011, 03:55 PM
(06-06-2011, 03:31 PM)pphuck Wrote:(06-06-2011, 11:27 AM)vbaba Wrote: Ra did not state many things! Ra's answers were limited to the questioner's knowledge and curiosity. Ra did not offer any information outside the scope of the question. Ra is like that!
Luckily, the question was asked explicitly, and answered.
Law of One Wrote:16.37 Questioner: I am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable. Understanding is not of this density.
16.38 Questioner: That is a very important point. I used the wrong word. What I meant to say was that I believed that it was not necessary for an entity to be consciously aware of the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density.
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
Tuning of your Understanding comes in 4D -- of course you can start earlier, but it is neither essential nor necessary for harvest from 3D to 4D.
Why would you have to understand explicitly that there is a choice between STS and STO to come to the realization that caring for other people makes more sense then caring for yourself, or the other way around?
You don't, for example, need to understand *anything* to have an experience of being One with All. Check out Zen, which is all about experiencing and nothing about understanding.
This is exactly it! I begged and screamed for help and mercy stating exactly "I DO NOT UNDERSTAND!" over and over before my "awakening".