09-10-2011, 03:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2011, 12:16 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(09-10-2011, 02:05 AM)unity100 Wrote: yes. and notice how confederation != Ra.
1300 BC entry can be any number of entities in confederation.
Really? And this besides we know of a pharaoh named Aten who, after having a transformative experience, changed his name to Akhenaten, and proclaimed a new religion built around an entity named Ra, which involved precepts like recognizing the One Infinite Creator present within all things.
Besides this we know Akhenaten to have a highly unusually shaped skull and body the likes of which "just so happen" to be similar to the description of Viracocha, in south america, who promulgated similar belief systems.
But this is just also coincidence and a grand fabrication of my mind, in your view?
(09-10-2011, 02:05 AM)unity100 Wrote: 'is now' is a linguistic phrase in english language that signifies imminent situation. it is not only used in literature as such, but also in political speeches. 'the time for change is now' does not mean change is under progress at that moment.
How you can continue to deny this is the same sort of "metaphorization" you are railing against is apparently beyond my comprehension.
(09-10-2011, 01:52 AM)Raman Wrote: A portion of the query being omitted simply means that Don did not ask the question in proper manner. In this case, simply the question was not clear to Ra. And Ra does not add info liberally as per Law of Confusion.
What do you mean "proper manner"?
In consideration of this:
Quote:Questioner: Thank you. I would like to go back to the plan of this Logos for Its creation and examine the philosophical basis that is the foundation for what was created in this local creation and the philosophy of the plan for experience. I am assuming that I am correct in stating that the foundation for this, as has been stated many times before, is the first distortion. After that, what was the plan in the philosophical sense?
it appears that we have an example that a query is so convoluted, that even Ra can't make sense of it.
Further on we have:
Quote:Questioner: Would it be possible for this work of our density to be performed if all of the sub-Logoi chose the same polarity in any particular expression or evolution of a Logos? Let us make the assumption that our sun created nothing but, through the first distortion, positive polarity. There was no product except positive polarity. Would work then be done in fourth density and higher as a function of only the positive polarization evolving from the original creation of our sub-Logos?
Ra: I am Ra. Elements of this query illustrate the reason I was unable to answer your previous question without knowledge of the Logos involved.
This further seems to contradict this view:
unity100 Wrote:the questioner, don being confusing does not confuse Ra, a 6d entity which is not part of time, and which is able to telepathically see and know what the intentions of not only questioner is, BUT also negative entity tailing the group, in detail.
I have identified the source of my idea that the rituals were not 100% effective. Also in the beginning of Book 4:
Quote:Questioner: Has our use of the Banishing Ritual of the Lesser Pentagram been of any value and what is its effect?
Ra: I am Ra. This group’s use of the Banishing Ritual of the Lesser Pentagram has been increasingly efficacious. Its effect is purification, cleansing, and protection of the place of working.
The efficacy of this ritual is only beginning to be, shall we say, at the lower limits of the truly magical. In doing the working those aspiring to adepthood have done the equivalent of beginning the schoolwork, many grades ahead. For the intelligent student this is not to be discouraged; rather to be encouraged is the homework, the reading, the writing, the arithmetic, as you might metaphorically call the elementary steps towards the study of being. It is the being that informs the working, not the working that informs the being. Therefore, we may leave you to the work you have begun.
The ritual is here, in Session 77, only beginning to be at the lower limits of the truly magical.
Would anybody care to shed some light on this?
Interesting. From 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose
unity100 Wrote:in my opinion, the 'negative' polarity, something which actually, logically can not exist and be valid (because nothing can ever strive to be infinite to express the infinity of existence of all of us), needs to be abolished. and i am assuming, it will be abolished.
unity100 Wrote:i dont agree with Ra. actually i disagree with them fundamentally.
unity100 Wrote:disagreement that exists is, Law of One is not valid for anything under total unity. there are paths, even different dimensions to accommodate entities, if one polarity goes out to accept the other, it is enslaved and it is no more.
unity100 Wrote:trying to practice Law of One, for under anything total unity, becomes unwise, from this respect.
unity100 Wrote:the attempts of Ra and others to teach 'Law of One' seems increasingly illogical and unwise, and even naive in that light :
unity100 Wrote:i cant come to terms and agree/unify with this current sun, when i look to it at all. we agree on the level of being one, yet, we are total disagreement about methods. it repels me.
So, have you changed your views since then? Because now you seem to vehemently defending Ra against all criticism where previously you said you fundamentally disagree with Ra and that Ra is illogical.
This would appear to be orders of magnitude beyond the "grand conclusions" that you have been railing against me for in multiple threads. Excuse me? Are you even serious here?
You can't abide by the slightest suggestion that the Ra material was not 100% pure when made by myself or Icaro, but you are free to make grandiose conclusions about the apparent idiocy of Ra, and even the Solar Logos itself?
Furthermore, it still appears that you previously considered yourself to be infinitely more wise than our own Logos. Is that still the case?
Wow. Unity100 vs. the Solar Logos. What an epic battle.
No wonder you seem to be unwilling to demonstrate any compassion toward sub-logoi you encounter on this forum. Well at least that clears some things up in my mind.