(04-05-2015, 02:48 PM)anagogy Wrote: I hold the Ra channelings dear as well. And don't take it as bible, but I've also learned so much from Ra's wisdom, that I can't just brush off a topic that they *DID* to some extent offer words on, just because I don't like what they say. So we have to ask ourselves, again, in the spirit of thinking for ourselves, if Ra is a sixth density service to others being of light, and it is allegedly depolarizing for an STO being to eat meat from animals, why would they advise it for Carla, an obviously STO being? Wouldn't they have offered her an STO vegan alternative instead? I mean, if it was unnecessary.
Just something worth thinking about, I thought.
It seems that they did at one point. But the people on this board have found that that quote says something else entirely. That's why Monica doesn't really bring it up. The people on this board say that Ra really meant to emphasize the use of preservatives:
Quote:84.2 Questioner: In the last session you mentioned least distorted complex protein in that the body complex of the instrument was capable of greatly increased distortion. Would you define the protein of which you spoke and we would like to know, increased distortion in which direction, towards health or ill-health?
Ra: I am Ra. We were, in the cautionary statement about complex protein, referring to the distortions of the animal protein which has been slaughtered and preservatives added in order to maintain the acceptability to your peoples of this non-living, physical material. It is well to attempt to find those items which are fresh and of the best quality possible in order to avoid increasing this particular entity’s distortions which may be loosely termed allergic.
We were speaking of the distortion towards disease which is potential at this space/time.
Category: Miscellanea: Meat
I just want to make clear that I'm not trying to speak for Monica. She mentioned this in one of the first few posts on this thread that I was a part of. I'm just repeating what she said.
I personally think it's worth investigating, but others have so conveniently disregarded it.
Edit #1: Sorry for the formatting of Ra's quote. I tried to fix it, but couldn't.
Edit #2: My bad. Monica mentioned it one of the first posts of the thread, Ra's Statement About 2D Entities; not on this thread.