Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Portal

    Latest Threads
    A Comprehensive Analysis ...
    Forum: Science & Technology
    Last Post: the
    08-06-2022, 09:25 AM
    » Replies: 495
    » Views: 456,374
    The mysterious nature of ...
    Forum: Olio
    Last Post: Confused
    08-06-2022, 07:14 AM
    » Replies: 16,731
    » Views: 8,410,337
    How genuine is your inten...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 03:53 AM
    » Replies: 28
    » Views: 66,571
    Choosing polarities, surv...
    Forum: Strictly Law of One Material
    Last Post: J.W.
    08-06-2022, 12:07 AM
    » Replies: 25
    » Views: 34,094
    what music are you listen...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: schubert
    08-05-2022, 11:51 PM
    » Replies: 3,650
    » Views: 2,685,509
    What youtube video are yo...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 08:24 PM
    » Replies: 502
    » Views: 328,213
    Are you going to take the...
    Forum: Health & Diet
    Last Post: zedro
    08-05-2022, 07:17 PM
    » Replies: 2,075
    » Views: 1,488,595
    Daily Q'uote
    Forum: L/L Research Channeling Archives
    Last Post: omcasey
    08-05-2022, 03:43 PM
    » Replies: 2,593
    » Views: 1,927,175
    what movie did you last w...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 09:11 AM
    » Replies: 386
    » Views: 514,365
    All-Time Favourite Hits o...
    Forum: Art, Media, & Entertainment
    Last Post: Dekalb_Blues
    08-05-2022, 04:20 AM
    » Replies: 39
    » Views: 42,677

    Search Forums

    (Advanced Search)

      Was Don, Carla, and Jim Wanderers from the Ra soul group?
    Posted by: jason - 04-30-2016, 03:02 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (19)

    Was Don, Carla, and Jim Wanderers from the Ra soul group?

    Apologies if this has been answered - I don't have the strength or will to search.

    There was an interesting exchange where Don asked Ra if he could ask this question - Ra said he may.

    And then it seemed Don got sidetracked in that exchange. I think it's when Ra first told them they were all Wanderers.

    Obviously they were and probably the vast majority of people posting here or who read this forum.


    Ra did say the majority of Wanderers on Earth were from their soul group.

    Just searching for answers

    TIA

    Print this item

      What do you think "density" means?
    Posted by: anagogy - 04-24-2016, 02:16 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (17)

    When Ra refers to "density" what do you think that they mean?

    Personally I think they mean "density of consciousness".  I think that a greater amount of "spiritual gravity" (which is synonymous with polarity) results in a higher concentration of awareness. It would seem to me that higher densities are NOT more dense with matter.  

    In fact, it seems that the lower the density is, the more concentrated or dense the matter is, and the higher the density, the more concentrated the presence of mind or awareness (and the lighter the manifestation of matter).

    What do YOU think?

    Print this item

      How do you personally picture infinity?
    Posted by: anagogy - 04-23-2016, 09:01 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (31)

    Quote:13.5 Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing in the creation?

    Ra: I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity is creation.

    13.6 Questioner: From this infinity then must have come what we experience as creation. What was the next step or the next evolvement?

    Ra: I am Ra. Infinity became aware. This was the next step.

    My current perspective is that infinity simply equals *ALL* possibility or potentiality.  

    "The rhythms are clothed in mystery, for they are being itself."

    The First Distortion
    And it is my supposition that when Ra says "infinity became aware" that what they actually mean is "infinity became *self* aware".  

    In other words, I think that infinity was always aware, as I believe awareness is the primal reality upon all else is predicated.  But I think that there was no differentiation, it was just raw beingness.  There was nothing to compare that beingness to, so while there was infinite intelligence there, it did not "know it". "Knowing" requires comparison -- a kind of contrast to set it apart as a difference.  Its kind of like: if you had never experienced pain, could you truly recognize pleasure?  Wouldn't you say awareness of one is intrinsically linked to awareness of the other? Beingness could have been dwelling in the most unimaginable ecstasy or bliss but might not have been able to "recognize it" for what it was without the relativity provided by the finite illusion.

    "There is no difference, potential or kinetic, in unity."

    The point at which "infinity became self aware" was the same point that the first distortion of free will came into being.  The infinite beingness that always was *willed* to "know itself".  So desire must have grown or percolated within that infinity somehow (to be honest, I find this the most mysterious part of the whole process).  Ra states that, "Unity, at this approximation of understanding, cannot be specified by any physics but only be activated or potentiated intelligent infinity due to the catalyst of free will. This may be difficult to accept."  Sounds like Ra knew we would find that particular part quite mysterious indeed.  But everything begins and ends in mystery after all.     

    So somehow this beingness chose to know itself.  My supposition is that beingness is driven by a primal need to create (because it is creativity/imagination itself -- the nucleus or unification of all potential variety) which always necessitates an exploration of finity, where such creation may actually occur in a meaningful and recognizable way.  It is like an artist that must express itself to feel complete.  So as one octave comes to a close and everything withdraws back into the "unmanifest", a directly proportionate desire grows in this intelligent infinity to *re-manifest*.  The apex point of this process is the 8th density point which is outside of time so naturally impossible to measure.  This causes ripples in the undistorted unity leading to the manifestation of distortions, or illusions which are central to the process that is the primal heartbeat of the creator from one creation to the next.  

    The artist finishes one masterpiece and feels the itch to create another one as per their eternal nature.

    The Second Distortion
    This leads to the second distortion: the focusing of Love known as the "Logos".  This is the focused, self aware manifestation of infinity -- the portion of infinity that KNOWS and is capable of knowing, rather than just BEING.  So now we have an organized self.  And as a self, it naturally has an "inner/outer" dichotomy.  The "inner" to this self is the whole of time/space or subjective sphere and the "outer" of this self is the whole of space/time or objective sphere from my perspective.

    The Third Distortion
    The third distortion was the creation or projection of "love/light" and "light/love".  In my opinion love/light is what time/space is constructed out of, and light/love is what space/time is created out of.  Essentially, it is the same energy, just on opposite sides of the continuum.

    --------------------------------------------------


    How do you picture infinity?  Feel free to share your thoughts in this thread.  


    --------------------------------------------------

    Print this item

      Extremely Free Density
    Posted by: AnthroHeart - 04-21-2016, 04:24 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (6)

    What does Ra mean here when he says that fifth density is an extremely free density?
    Why are other densities not mentioned to be so free?

    43.14 Questioner: Then the big difference in harvestability between third and fourth density is that at the end of the third density the individual is harvested as a function of individual violet ray, but in fourth density, is it the equivalent of violet-ray then for the entire social memory complex that must be of a harvestable nature to go to fifth density?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct although in fifth density entities may choose to learn as a social memory complex or as mind/body/spirit complexes and may graduate to sixth density under these conditions, for the wisdom density is an extremely free density whereas the lessons of compassion leading to wisdom necessarily have to do with other-selves.

    Print this item

      Arranging opportunities?
    Posted by: Verum Occultum - 04-19-2016, 06:03 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (13)

    Hello all! I found an interesting phenomenon in the category "psychic greeting". I assume this has been discussed previously. However, in curiosity I wonder what does "arranging opportunities" mean in this context? Did the negatives subtly organize certain entities together and predicted the outcome? Without deeply plunging into the specificity of what happened in Carla's life at that time, could you please share your view on what you think that means? Do you think there were telepathic influences from the negatives, and if there were, how do you think that affected the free will of the ones in the situation? Thank you.

    Quote:25.1 Questioner: …asking first what cause or complex of causes has led to the instrument’s chest cold, as it is called?

    Ra: I am Ra. This distortion towards illness was caused by the free will of the instrument in accepting a chemical substance which you call LSD. This was carefully planned by those entities which do not desire this instrument to remain viable. The substance has within it the facility of removing large stores of vital energy from the ingestor. The first hope of the Orion entity which arranged this opportunity was that this instrument would become less polarized towards what you call the positive. Due to conscious efforts upon the part of this instrument, using the substance as a programmer for service to others and for thankfulness, this instrument was spared this distortion and there was no result satisfactory to the Orion group.

    Print this item

      Attack of the Slashes Part II: Probability/Possibility vs Possibility/Probability
    Posted by: APeacefulWarrior - 04-18-2016, 12:46 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (9)

    Since we already have one good discussion going on regarding space/time vs time/space, this seems like a good time for me to throw out a (probably somewhat trivial) question I've been pondering for awhile.

    At multiple points, Ra refers to both "probability/possibility" AND "possibility/probability" vortices, when he talks about the intricacies of trying to read the future.  He seems to favor "possibility/probability" by about 2:1, judging by search results, but still uses both versions.  He even occasionally uses both in the same sentence, such as "This is approximate due to the fact that parallel possibility/probability vortices cease when action occurs and new probability/possibility vortices are begun."  (11.3)  At another point, he uses them alternately in back-to-back answers, 36.2 and 36.3.

    Which leads me to wonder:  Is there actually a difference, as there is with space/time vs time/space?  Or are the terms effectively interchangeable, with the slash merely representing overlapping definitions?

    Personally, I really can't find that much which would suggest they have significantly different definitions.  But it seems unlike Ra to use terminology in a vague or unclear fashion, especially since his use of slashed words is generally more precise than that.  If there was only one definition, wouldn't he have picked one variation on the term and stuck with it?

    Anyone got an opinion on this one?  

    Print this item

      Incarnative Process
    Posted by: Aion - 04-16-2016, 01:44 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (22)

    Quote:6.11 Questioner: How did they come here?

    Ra: They came through the process of harvest and were incarnated through the processes of incarnation from your higher spheres within this density.

    Quote:69.13 Questioner: You said the higher self is reluctant to enter negative space/time. Is that correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. The incarnative process involves being incarnated from time/space to space/time. This is correct.

    Quote:21.6 Questioner: I see. Then no incarnation occurred before this master 75,000-year cycle of Maldek entities. Correct?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is correct in the sense of incarnation in third-density time/space.

    21.7 Questioner: Were there any of these entities then incarnated in second density before the 75,000-year cycle?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. These particular entities were incarnate in time/space third density, that is, the so-called inner planes, undergoing the process of healing and approaching realization of their action.

    Okay, so I am trying to understand the concept of incarnation as it is applied in the Ra Material but I am seeing some inconsistencies. At first I thought Ra's explanation of incarnation being a process of a time/space being being 'enfleshed' in space/time makes sense to me, but then I found these quotes talking about incarnation in time/space.

    Has anyone else found any other explanation for what incarnation actually IS? They talk about entities incarnating from 'higher spheres' which I presume are higher sub-densities within our density but then say they incarnated in time/space, the inner planes. So does that mean incarnation isn't just lateral or from time/space to space/time but also includes those translations from one density to another density? Or is incarnation more to do with "activation" of the bodies, so can one "activate" say the yellow-ray body but do so in time/space rather than space/time? So if a higher density entity incarnates in to a lower density time/space, they can then incarnate 'again' in to space/time from there? This word needs some clarity I feel.

    Any thoughts?

    Print this item

      Time/Space: A mistake or not in 70.6/7 ?
    Posted by: Sean Hsu - 04-16-2016, 10:15 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (16)

    Hi, dear seekers,

    This is my first thread in this wonderful forum, but I am not new here for I have enjoyed reading lots of threads since I registered. Now as I think I get a question worthy of clarification, I decide to initiate this discussion. Here we go:

    There is a obvious contradiction regarding the use of time/space and space/time between 69.11 and 70.6/7/14, as is noted by ①②③④⑤:

    Quote:
    69.11 Questioner: Can you tell me of the situation that the Wanderer finds itself in and why the path back cannot be the simple moving back into the same value of positive time/space?
    Ra: I am Ra. The path back revolves, firstly, about the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative space/time①. This may be a significant part of the length of that path. Secondly, when a positively oriented entity incarnates in a thoroughly negative environment it must needs learn/teach the lessons of the love of self thus becoming one with its other-selves.

    70.6 Questioner: In the last session Ra stated that “the path back from sixth-density negative time/space revolves, firstly, about the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative time/space②.” Could you explain the higher self’s position with respect to positive and negative time/space and why it is so reluctant to enter negative time/space③ that it is necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time to find its path back?
    Ra: I am Ra. In brief, you have answered your own query. Please question further for more precise information.

    70.7 Questioner: Why is the higher self reluctant to enter negative time/space④?
    Ra: I am Ra. The Higher Self is reluctant to allow its mind/body/spirit complex to enter negative time/space⑤ for the same basic reason an entity of your societal complex would be reluctant to enter a prison.

    70.14 Questioner: Oh yes. Sorry about that. It slipped my mind. Now, if a positive entity is displaced to negative time/space I understand that the higher self is reluctant to enter the negative time/space⑥. And for some reason this makes it necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time. Why is it necessary for this incarnation in negative space/time?
    Ra: I am Ra. Firstly, let us remove the concept of reluctance from the equation and then secondly, address your query more to the point. Each time/space is an analog of a particular sort or vibration of space/time. When a negative time/space is entered by an entity the next experience will be that of the appropriate space/time. This is normally done by the form-making body of a mind/body/spirit complex which places the entity in the proper time/space for incarnation.

    What I want to discuss with you is the question: whether Don and Ra both made mistakes in 70.6/7/14.

    One viewpoint is that both Don and Ra made mistakes in 70.6/7/14, so we need to replace time/space with space/time in 70.6/7/14. The reason is that,

    Quote:
    In this particular case the answer we are looking for comes from logic and previous information on time/space and space/time from Ra. We know from Ra’s previous comments that in every density entities incarnate from time/space into space/time. We also have numerous instances in Sessions #68 and #69 where Ra correctly states this information in regards to displacement into negative time/space for a positive entity.

    Ra occasionally would make errors due either to Carla’s low vital energy or to pain flares in her body. Ra did this a couple of times in Session #70 and Don was drawn into making mistakes in his questions regarding the time/space and space/time situation. So we need to go with logic here and what we know from previous comments from Ra about the time/space and space/time situation.


    However, I do not agree with this viewpoint to replace “time/space” with “space/time” as below:

    Quote:
    70.6 Questioner: In the last session Ra stated that “the path back from sixth-density negative time/space revolves, firstly, about the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative space/time②.” Could you explain the higher self’s position with respect to positive and negative time/space and why it is so reluctant to enter negative space/time③ that it is necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time to find its path back?
    Ra: I am Ra. In brief, you have answered your own query. Please question further for more precise information.

    70.7 Questioner: Why is the higher self reluctant to enter negative space/time④?
    Ra: I am Ra. The Higher Self is reluctant to allow its mind/body/spirit complex to enter negative space/time⑤ for the same basic reason an entity of your societal complex would be reluctant to enter a prison.

    70.14 Questioner: Oh yes. Sorry about that. It slipped my mind. Now, if a positive entity is displaced to negative time/space I understand that the higher self is reluctant to enter the negative time/space⑥. And for some reason this makes it necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time. Why is it necessary for this incarnation in negative space/time?


    My viewpoint is that firstly Don did intentionally replace s/t with t/s in 70.6/7; secondly, Ra might have had not grasped the thrust of Don's question there until Don made it clear in 70.17.


    Quote:70.17 Questioner: Now here is the point of my confusion. If, after physical death, a Wanderer would return to his home planet, shall I say, why cannot the same entity be extracted from negative time/space to the home planet rather than incarnating in negative space/time?
    Ra: I am Ra. As we stated, the position in negative time/space, of which we previously were speaking, is that position which is pre-incarnative. After the death of the physical complex in yellow-ray activation the mind/body/spirit complex moves to a far different portion of time/space in which the indigo body will allow much healing and review to take place before any movement is made towards another incarnative experience.

    I perceive a basic miscalculation upon your part in that time/space is no more homogenous than space/time. It is as complex and complete a system of illusions, dances, and pattern as is space/time and has as structured a system of what you may call natural laws.

    My argument is mainly based on the question Don asked in 70.6:
    • why it is so reluctant to enter negative time/space that it is necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time to find its path back?
    There is a cause and effect in this sentence grammatically. I sense Don did suppose that the mind/body/spirit complex has to incarnate in the negative space/time to find its path back because the Higher Self is very reluctant to enter negative time/space (in that the positive mind/body/spirit complex will experience only darkness in negative time/space), although Don did not know the reason behind that and asked for it.

    If Don mis-spoke here, the sentence itself makes no sense in my eyes as you can see when you replace "time/space" with "space/time". 

    Besides, if we were to replace the word “time/space” in number ⑥ in 70.14 for the same reason as in 70.6/7, it makes the contradiction more clearly; that is, in 70.14, Don said that, “this (namely, the higher self is reluctant to enter the negative space/time) makes it necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time.” Does this sentence make any sense?

    In my eyes, it contradicts itself more obviously than the last sentence in 70.6 when time/space is replaced with space/time, for the higher self’s reluctance to enter the negative space/time only delays the entrance into the negative space/time, rather than make it necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time. After all, Ra said in 68.7 that “the Higher Self could allow the mind/body/spirit complex to remain in time/space.”

    Supposing Don intentionally used time/space, I guess he inferred from what Ra answered in 69.11 that the displaced mind/body/spirit complex cannot simply be moved back (possibly by the Higher Self) through the same path whereby it is lured in time/space (or, be extracted from negative time/space to the home planet) due to the High Self's reluctance to enter negative time/space.

    The thrust of my suggestion is that, before session 68, Don thought the displaced spirit can be extracted from negative time/space to the home planet, just as what happened to the space girl (who represents Carla's spirit) in the end of the predictive novel, The Crucifixion of Esmerelda Sweetwater. Thus, Don might use Ra's first part of answer in 69.11 ("the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative space/time"; in which he replaced s/t with t/s) to explain why that extraction is impossible. In fact, Ra's first part of answer indeed dealt with the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative space/time, although Ra might overlook the thrust of the question Don asked.

    Accordingly, the prison metaphor in 70.7, as Don see it, may or may not refer to the state for the positive mind/body/spirit complex in negative space/time. It is indeed so that the condition in negative space/time for a positive mind/body/spirit is like a prison. It also makes sense that the condition in negative time/space for a positive mind/body/spirit is also like a prison (Where only darkness will be experienced. . . A barrier is automatically formed.(68.7)). 

    Please pardon me for my lengthiness, but I want to make my point more clearly; that is,

    Quote:
    In 70.6, in my interpretation, there may be just one mistake in Don's second mention of time/space. The cause for this mistake, as I mentioned, is that Don misused Ra's first part of answer ("the path back revolves, firstly, about the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative space/time" where he intentionally replaced space/time with time/space) in 69.11 to explain why "the displaced mind/body/spirit cannot be extracted from negative time/space to the home planet". Thus, although Don made a mistake in understanding, he did not misspeak the word here. Accordingly, the question in 70.7 may be dealing with time/space rather than space/time. 

    I infer that, when the question was being asked in 70.14/17, the reasoning in Don's mind is that: (1) entering negative time/space is like entering a prison =(thus)=>  (2) the higher self is reluctant for its own mind/body/spirit complex to enter negative time/space, which Don said he understood in 70.14 =(thus)=> (3) there are still some reason in between, which Don still had not understood =(thus)=> (4) the positive wander cannot be extracted from negative time/space to the home planet  =(thus)=> (5) it is necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time to find its path back.

    Then from Ra's view, since time/space is no more homogenous than space/time, it is understandable that the displaced positive spirit cannot be extracted from the negative time/space to its home planet. Thus, the reasoning of Ra in 70.6/7 may simply be that: (a) entering negative time/space is like entering a prison =(thus)=> (b) the higher self is reluctant for the displaced mind/body/spirit complex to enter negative time/space, although the higher self is also reluctant (to a less extent) for the displaced mind/body/spirit complex to enter negative space/time  =(thus; no need for (3)(4) in Don's reasoning)=> © it is necessary for the mind/body/spirit complex to incarnate in negative space/time to find its path back. Consequently, Don's question (why it is necessary for this incarnation in negative space/time) in 70.14 is "perplex" for Ra when Ra had not perceived the basic miscalculation of Don until Ra did in 70.17. 

    Note: Don may also have made one another mistake; that is, Don thought it is for the higher self's own mind/body/spirit complex that the higher self is reluctance to enter negative time/space. However, Ra meant that it is for the displaced mind/body/spirit complex that the higher self is reluctance to enter negative time/space.

    Based on my interpretation above, if we are to consider a replacement of any other time/space with space/time as correct in 70.6, we will change what Don meant by these words and mislead future readers. In other words, readers will tend to think Don just misspoke in these places rather than think he intentionally changed words. 

    In 70.7, as I mentioned before, Ra may or may not have made a mistake. That's why I also suggested leaving 70.7 as it is. If we are to indicate the correct words in 70.7 are space/time, we may also make a mistake since we are not sure whether Ra really meant to say space/time here. 


    I think I have exhausted my thoughts on this question and made my point more clear now. If I have made some mistakes, please let me know. If my arguments and reasoning are sound, I only suggest an indication that Don did not cite the sentence correctly as Ra said it in 69.11, and Don may had made a mistake in 70.6 (this indication alone is enough for readers to infer that 69.11 is correct as it is, and that Don made a mistake in 70.6), leaving various possible interpretations for readers themselves.

    Now I would like to know your viewpoints on this question. Our discussion may have the possibility/probability vortex of improving the latest edition of the Ra Contact.

    Thank you all very much for your energy, patience and tolerance of my poor writing in English. I appreciate the opportunity to start this discussion with you. Smile


    A note added on 06-04-2016 

    To be fair, one point (which I forgot to mention in the original post) needs to be made clearly for the edits which the editor made in 70.6/7.

    One reason why the editor thinks Ra made mistakes in 70.6/7 is that he thinks entities only enter or incarnate in space/time rather than time/space, because, as he said, "what we know from what Ra has told us throughout the contact is that entities reside in time/space in any of the densities before incarnating into space/time."  

    However, I found that entities can either incarnate into space/time, or incarnate into time/space, as you can see below: 
    Quote:21.7 Questioner: Were there any of these entities then incarnated in second density before the 75,000-year cycle?
    Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. These particular entities were incarnate in time/space third density, that is, the so-called inner planes, undergoing the process of healing and approaching realization of their action.

    Thus, the higher self’s reluctance to enter negative time/space is not necessary wrong. That is to say, both of time/space and space/time can be entered. So it's possible that the basis of the editor's reasoning may be inadequate.



    A note added on 06-09-2016

    It turns out that due to some miscommunication,  I am wrong in assuming that the editor tends to replace time/space with space/time in 70.6/7. So the text in question will not be changed, as Austin said in #16 of this thread,  

    Quote:In the project with the new Ra Contact book, procedure will be to not change any of Ra's words directly, even in instances where they make corrections themselves. At most, footnotes will be added where mistakes and confusions are seen, just like on http://www.lawofone.info

    Print this item

      The "withheld" topic
    Posted by: Rolci - 04-15-2016, 07:21 PM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (40)

    I have found many times in the Ra Material instances when Ra withhold info. I will list them here as I re-read. And I do not mean the occasions when intermediate material is required or knowledge they themselves do not plumb. I mean the ones withheld for obscure reasons. I find these particularly intriguing, trying to guess what's going on with them, and it would be great if we were to discuss them here. The first one from session 16:

    Questioner: Well, roughly how many total planets in this galaxy of stars that we’re in have aware life regardless of density?

    Ra: I am Ra. Approximately six seven, oh oh oh, oh oh oh [67,000,000].

    Questioner: Can you tell me what percentage of those are third, fourth, fifth, sixth density, etc.? Roughly, very roughly.

    Ra: I am Ra. A percentage seventeen for first density, a percentage twenty for second density, a percentage twenty-seven for third density, a percentage sixteen for fourth density, a percentage six for fifth density. The other information must be withheld. The free will of your future is not making this available. We shall speak on one item. There is a fairly large percentage, approximately thirty-five percent of the intelligent planets, which do not fit in the percentiles. These mysteries are of sixth and seventh density and are not available for our speaking.

    I'd love to make a start on this one, but I'm pretty much clueless. A good start would be to figure out what "intelligent planets" means, and then what "do not fit the percentiles" could be all about. And 35% of what exactly are we talking about again? Also I thought I had an idea what the "free will of your future" may refer to, but then Don was obviously asking about current percentages, which is what the given figures apply to, obviously, ignoring the deeper truth of the illusory nature of time. So no idea on that one either. Also notice that Don was asking about "aware life", which then he further specifies in his second question an understood by him to be 3rd D on, yet the reply includes 1-2nd. And is Ra's "intelligent" planets" then synonymous with Don's "aware life", even though they ignored that bit initially, or is that supposed to be some different categorization? And finally, what could be the mysteries of 6-7th D? Apart from that we do know about them from materials already channeled. Up for the guessing!

    Print this item

      lawofone.info now has audio
    Posted by: rva_jeremy - 04-10-2016, 11:23 AM - Forum: Strictly Law of One Material - Replies (8)

    Whoa, not sure when Tobey dropped this, but within each question/answer you can now listen directly to the audio of the Ra contact!  There's a little "play" triangle next to each q/a pair.  I haven't heard most of this and it sheds some light on how much patience one must have had to communicate with those of Ra.

    [Image: CfsN3HJWEAAxDRT.jpg:large]

    Print this item

    Pages (165): « Previous 1 … 54 55 56 57 58 … 165 Next »
     

    Forum Statistics
    » Members: 12,007
    » Latest member: Phantomy
    » Forum threads: 15,903
    » Forum posts: 300,175

    Full Statistics

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media