An Introduction to the Tarot as taught by Ra

[sillypumpkins]

Which tarot is used/suggested by Ra? I would like to purchase the same one to study them. Thanks

Don used the Brotherhood of Light deck by CC Zain: http://green-door.narod.ru/zaintarot.html

!!

[Diana]

Which tarot is used/suggested by Ra? I would like to purchase the same one to study them. Thanks

It's easier really to just go on the lawofone.info and all the cards are there which were redrawn according to comments from Ra, along with references to each card in the Ra Material. The Brotherhood of Light deck is also good for reference, but the astrological references in those cards were not relevant according to Ra. 

Here is the landing page and where to access the card info:

[Navaratna]

Which tarot is used/suggested by Ra? I would like to purchase the same one to study them. Thanks

It's easier really to just go on the lawofone.info and all the cards are there which were redrawn according to comments from Ra, along with references to each card in the Ra Material. The Brotherhood of Light deck is also good for reference, but the astrological references in those cards were not relevant according to Ra. 

Here is the landing page and where to access the card info:

Hey look at my thread, there has long been known to be a relationship to the Tarot and Zodiac houses. Even if they are not relevant according to their depiction according to Ra, 6 x 4 Zodiac houses is 1 Axial precession. I think I'm the first to notice this correspondence and I don't think I deserve a slice of pizza for it, but considering I've seen an astrological engine designed around what it contained in Ra material I'd really like some feedback. I can think of another example of how someone added to what I was sharing and said there's 13 musical octaves and it immediately reminded me of how in Mesoamerican astronomy 13 x 20 [number of fingers and toes] = 260 days a timecycle. These data can be worked in to a universal hologram engine. Sadly I myself don't have that expertise.

I remember reading some stuff that might fit in to all of these relationships in a book I read called Pyramid of Fire: The Lost Aztec codex. it is starting to click a little more considering Tlaloc/Ehecatl/Quetzalcoatl are aspects of Venus [Ra] and Huitzilopochtli is represented by the planet Mars [Navaratna 7 density 7 sahasrara]. Together the three temples formed the most holy sanctum of the Templo mayor in Tenochtitlan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templo_Mayor

https://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=18170

"I think a better way to try and describe my ideas in the way they relate to our experience is the fact that 384 days, which is a lunar year-- is 67 years 365 day long solar years when multiplied by 64 [384x64].

So keeping this in mind, 1945 end of WWII-2012 was a 67 years epoch. Both mesoamerican and I ching timekeeping systems tracked this. I'll portray more of the math.

64x 67 = 4288 years is A zodiac age.
6 times [4288] a zodiac age is-- 25728 years, one precession of the equinox. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_precession

Also in the zodiac there is are ages represented by the dragon. [DNA/Coiled serpent/kundalini]

It's astronomy and has real world implications. The I Ching is a copy of our genetic patterns. Look up the dragons Fu Xi and Nu Wa, the purported authors of the I Ching. Someone trying to tell me that primitive man in neolithic china just took some sticks and sheep bones and like 12 hominids randomly typing at dirt and bamboo papyrus randomly came up with the genetic sequence patterns of DNA-RNA is some waste of my time. sounds like that analogy of 12 monkeys at a typewriter if given long enough would type up Shakespeare. Especially considering there multiple arrangement and they all have 64 hexagrams [DNA codons]. 6 lines per hexagram and 64 hexagrams yields these number sets.

Edgar cayce lived 67 years. Died in 1945
He was born around the time Edison invented the lightbulb 1879, illuminating our world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEA-8_i9vZY"

[joshyates1980]

Are you saying to just contemplate all the archetypes, in the formation described? Or is there another way to use it after the initial work is done, such as: you have hit a brick wall about something, and you now consult the cards to inform where you need to look (and since you have already seen yourself in all the archetypes you may understand better what the card(s) bring up regarding that brick wall)?

Hi Diana!  In response to your query, I would say:

once the basics are down and internalised, go with your intuition.  That doesn't sound like much of an answer at all, but everyone's experience of the tarot is unique.  Some people respond vigorously to the images, others more to the resonance of the name of the card, etc.

I can say that once you become more sensitive to the archetypes, you can scan the ladders from bottom to top, and you can feel a sticking point where the energies are choked.  You can then hone in on that card and try to ask it what it is trying to teach you.

I guess you could also get the 21 cards and shuffle them, and allow your Higher Self to pick the card for you.

I'm sure there's a million inventive ways to use the cards!

---

images are here if you want to contemplate them: http://www.lawofone.info/images/

they can also be found in the back of Book 4.
PDF of Book 4
The images there are really beautiful to look at, and come fully labelled

Here is another website that organized the tarot nicely: http://www.thirddensity.com/tarot/