06-02-2010, 02:30 AM
(06-02-2010, 01:55 AM)Turtle Wrote:(06-01-2010, 09:55 PM)unity100 Wrote: literal definitions of infinity will not avail in this level of philosophizing. because it will generally involve mathematical or size related definitions.
From Ra's 6d perspective, they are aware that every finite entity is the Infinite Creator. If we are to believe Ra's words, then they are in a level of awareness where the paradoxes of lower densities are resolved, or put another way, they are aware of the harmony of all paradoxes. It is then only our limited awareness, not our ability to use logic, that keeps this conversation going.
This is why both you and I are correct. I am a finite separate being. I am also an infinite being unified with all that exists. We are just not aware of our infinite unified mind, we are only aware of our finite separate minds.....from Ra's perspective at least. And yes, we are speaking of mathematical concepts here. Finite beings (single AND plural) vs Infinite being (immeasurable). It is a problem of math as well as spirituality/philosophy.
Godspeed!
Nicely put, in fact I believe the argument is resolved as our limited perspective dims our sight of what is behind the curtains.