2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose

[Ali Quadir]

We may not be able to prove our individual perceptions, but red truly is an area of the spectrum of light which is very definable, even in our distorted language.

That's not what it is. A spectrum is merely a model for understanding light. Just like the seeing experience of red is a distortion of the underlying reality, so is the spectral model.

I think that there are two distinct levels of thought. Our brain is part of the physical vehicle that houses our entity and allows the expression of our light body in the third dimension as a third density being. It is not as if our mental capacity will cease to be.

It will to a large extent. Our faculties are clearly located in the brain neurology is quite clear on this. However this is not the holder of our intelligence. We have other systems to process information with. So consciousness will not break down. We just won't experience thinking like we do now. It will be different more dreamlike where you know stuff because you direct your consciousness towards it.

While I understand at a level beyond that which I can verbally express adequately, that verbal language, time, birth and death do not exist beyond this density, I am aware that technically the words used to describe the understanding will be flawed at best, but I do not however, agree, that anything that can be named or defined falls into the category of being a distortion itself. In order for discussion and exchange of information, we must, as third density beings, name and describe things to the best of our ability, progress comes in acceptance of the verbal distortion needed to express something, without losing sight of the thing in its pure form.

Yes I agree, I think You are correct in your line of thinking. But since all is one in reality. Every "thing" in it must be a distortion of the one reality. Every thing is a reflection of a more subtle thing behind it all the way back to total oneness. So we think the same but where you stop and call a thing a thing I say go on, what is behind the thing? What is it a distortion of?