Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies L/L Research Channeling Archives 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose

    Thread: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #128
    07-12-2010, 01:58 PM (This post was last modified: 07-12-2010, 02:56 PM by unity100.)
    (07-12-2010, 01:18 PM)airwaves Wrote:
    (07-12-2010, 12:59 PM)airwaves Wrote: Ra and company

    That may indeed be the only part that Ra played. As has been discussed in detail before, there is always that sticky substance in this experience called distortion.

    with Ra and company, i mean those who graduated during the time of light veil, with the aid from higher densities through pyramid structures or systems like tarot.

    probably very bunch which came to aid this world through pyramid teaching in atlantis, egypt and etc.

    Quote:And as mentioned before, I shall do my best to dig up this session if it indeed exists and was not a very lucid dream of mine. Most if not all of the seekers here would find it a very interesting read and more over quite entertaining and enlightening. As Ali once quoted from a source that do not know of "Laughter is often the first reaction to recognition of great truth."

    Edit: For your viewing pleasure http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._0321.aspx

    now now. this is an interesting bit.

    this channeling seems to be describing the yahweh, yehovah event and their annunaki issue, that Ra spoke about. it is quite interesting.

    but, an identification seems to be wrong :

    quo sees the problem in the improved ape body. however, technically, not the improvedness of the ape body, but, that ape body being in minority and better than the contemporary, and majority ape bodies, was probably the factor in creating the 'privileged', 'special' biases in the entities that incarnated in those ape bodies.

    had all ape bodies been sufficiently advanced, there would be no means to create that bias.

    but then again, there is an important factor - you bring and mix a late 3rd density soul population, with entities that are going towards the end of 2d.

    even if there wasnt any particular difference in ape bodies, the souls from late 3d, would notice and get estranged from entities in late 2d even in soul level.

    firstly, rightfully, because late 2d would be much more coarse and unrefined in regard to behavior, wouldnt be as sensitive as a late 3d entity in regard to other entities (in any level, not necessarily love), and this would create irritation and estrangement in 3d entities that were being irritated or harmed by their behavior.

    second, they would get estranged because they were, as souls, from another planet. they would have different traits as a soul population, they would also know that they are from somewhere else in a soul level, deep down.

    thus, the estrangement would happen even if the bodies were same, even if much less.

    firstly the error in this solar locale, is the error of implementing a strong veil. when you separate the entity from the influxes and flows of the creation at a given locale, you cant expect them to work well with them and evolve in whatever evolutionary possibilities that are available to them in that locale. it is unwise.

    second seems to be the error of yahweh in bringing the population from mars, and carefreely mixing them with the resident late 2d population. that population should have been isolated. ra said isolation was possible in the 2nd cycle, despite not being possible in the last cycle. (in the subject of 250 people who graduated in the last cycle). that means, for first 50,000 years of this last 75,000 years, isolation was possible. thus, that population should be isolated, the rest of the population should have completed their 2d cycle and graduated, and all ape bodies upgraded with the new body before all being mixed. within this time, the mars population would have found the possibility of engaging in wars in between them, to learn and get rid of their violent nature too. also, no technology should have been given to them until they were free of those biases.

    in the current situation, not only they gained those biases, but also embroiled whole world with war, even after the heavy quarantine, and even after atlantis escapade. they just herded the earth native (or immigrant) population into war under them. at this point the violent and chaotic history of ancient middle east comes to mind ...

    but i also noticed one very important bit in that session :

    Quote:Those who do not choose to graduate will necessarily fall back to the instincts to late second density as they prepare to start another third-density cycle elsewhere.

    this, may explain the orange tint on this planet, and increasing orange ray related manifestations. i think this is very, very, very important for all of us to keep always in mind in these coming few years.
    Another reason of the failure on this planet is, as far as i see, the below, despite it seems to be a sub result of the heavy veiling :

    The philosophy, understanding, concept of 'everything is one', 'god is one', have no place in 3d. It is not compatible with it.

    Imagine you are a new or midway 3d entity. You are either fresh out of 2d, and its herd consciousness, and you are only realizing that there exist other entities outside you, you are an entity yourself, and everything is not an extension of your own self.

    Then, someone comes with a philosophy of 'everything is one, god is one etc, and love each other because you are one'.

    regardless of how you are compelled/coerced to do that, how can you actually manifest that consciousness ?

    loving everything, accepting everything in unison because everything is unified, in unison, may be the understanding and practice of 6d. but, how do you manifest it in 3d, as a 3d entity ? you are expected to love everything, because everything is one. there is a casualization, a rationale, a reason-decision relationship in the proposition in the first place.

    it is impossible for you to right away connect to intelligent infinity through the 6d, and then manifest that understanding as a newly 3d entity. unless you are helped through different means, however that is another matter.

    so, what can you do ?

    lets see, it says everything is one, everything is in unison. what is the closes thing to this that you know, as a consciousness ?

    2d herd consciousness. therefore, you easily slide back to that consciousness, and reflect the understanding of the herd and 2d, on the philosophy you are facing, and its peripheral ideas. everything is one, everyone is one, and therefore you need to love everything.

    naturally, all the corollaries of the herd consciousness will reflect on this ; herd requires you to conform with the herd, herd doesnt like anyone behaving differently and sticking out, herd doesnt like what's outside the herd. this way, all the social interactions naturally get tied to herd behavior. and this, as you probably already experience, creates all kinds of problems we see on the world, related to application of orange ray on every kind of feeling, concept and idea, ranging from politics to love in between spouses, or family, leave aside religion.

    there is another concept. there is the talk of a god, which is that everything that is one. it is a singular entity. what kind of thing is that ? is it possible for a new 3d entity to be able to realize and manifest an understanding of a unison, acting in a harmony like almost one being, but actually being comprised of infinite aspects ?

    hardly. naturally the entity will again fall back to what it knows as closest to this understanding, and for this particular planet this will probably be the herd leader that dominates and decides what happens in the herd. as the herd consciousness on this planet happens to be with the dominance of strongest male, the one god that is so perceived takes on the traits of a powerful patriarch. the powerful part is very significant, since it carries various understandings of the herd into the religion as such. god almighty, god great, and so on.

    and the immediate consequences of these in social life, is maintaining of the herd consciousness, and as per the herd consciousness, strongest member of the herd dominating the society by its aides that are lesser dominators in themselves. politically, socially, or spiritually.

    .......................

    now we have an interesting parallel here. after the veiling, and cutting of 3d entities from subconscious, and oneness of everything, entities have aided Ra and other various societies through the veil, by using various teachings, channelings, methods, structures (pyramids) and so on.

    because the veil was rather thin, these methods were successful, and entities were able to contact intelligent infinity, manifest an understanding of 6d, and therefore realize how an infinite unity of infinite numbers of finite individuals could happen. therefore, it was possible for them to perceive or glimpse the 6d understanding, and therefore practice loving each other, accepting each other without falling back to herd consciousness.

    then, these groups have thought that they could also help the earth population through the same means. however, there was a difference at this point - veil was heavier, and therefore contacting infinite intelligence was harder, even if pyramids, techniques, contraptions were used.

    thus, apparently despite all the effort, they were able to only make some of the population contact infinity through these methods, and these entities were expected to teach the others. however, this was even harder for them, for they were 3d entities living under a heavy veil. therefore, the teaching became more oriented on idea part of the method, rather than having equal emphasis in between the actual infinity contact and idea. thus, this in a fashion aided the creation of a teacher/priest caste, which deteriorated in an ongoing fashion as time went on and teachings were distorted/faded due to initial teachers being out of the way, and aided the advent of organized religions.

    therefore, we reach the same conclusion again :

    understanding, practices, methods, and manifestation of 6d, has no place in 3d. hampering 3d through artificial measures (veil) and then trying to remedy it through bringing in the understandings and practices of higher densities (6d in this case) creates problems in other ways. you patch up one problem, others come up.

    this gives us a very important lesson ; if you hamper the natural flow of energies, creation in any way, there will be problems. if you patch a problem, the problem will shift, and become some other problem. it is inevitable.

    ...................

    3d is the density of 'there are others than me'. and it should be experienced and lived as such. higher density understandings and practices have no business in 3d. 3d is a density in which the entities will experience various joys and interactions in between themselves, in alignment with their own energy flows from the roots of their own mind, and the influxes from their higher self at that point in time. complex ideas, thoughts, practices, higher density learning, is not required or should be in 3d. just like we are not trying to educate 2d entities with the philosophy and understanding of 6d, or 4d, we shouldnt try to first hamper the 3d entities, and then try to circumvent that fence with the higher density teachings. 3d entities should have access to as much technology as they need to be relatively independent of the rigors and dangers of 2d (there 'having to be danger in 2d' is also questionable and another long topic in itself - had the 2d not been as vile and dangerous as they are on the planet we know and some others, there would be no need for technology), but they should not have access to phenomenonal technology that can destroy their planet, or themselves en masse. just like how you dont give a shotgun to the hand of a 9 year old in the park, and expect it to be mature enough not to shoot its fellows playing in the park.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 04:09 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 04:41 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 04:52 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 05:34 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 09:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 11:16 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-18-2010, 08:41 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-18-2010, 11:29 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 02-11-2011, 11:37 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 02-12-2011, 04:52 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 02-12-2011, 06:32 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 05:07 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 05:17 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by David Junior - 09-20-2011, 02:24 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 05:36 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 05:49 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 06:08 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 06:35 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 06:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 06:59 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 05-30-2010, 06:59 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Observer - 12-08-2011, 06:23 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-30-2010, 07:18 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-30-2010, 07:23 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 05-30-2010, 10:05 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Peregrinus - 05-31-2010, 12:38 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-31-2010, 06:56 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 02-26-2011, 03:01 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-10-2011, 04:19 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-10-2011, 10:03 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-14-2011, 12:57 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-31-2010, 04:43 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by peelstreetguy - 05-31-2010, 11:11 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-31-2010, 01:27 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 05-31-2010, 08:02 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 05-31-2010, 10:49 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-01-2010, 07:16 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-01-2010, 10:43 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-02-2010, 12:33 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-02-2010, 05:35 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-02-2010, 05:50 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-02-2010, 06:20 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-01-2010, 06:10 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-01-2010, 08:52 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-01-2010, 09:55 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-02-2010, 01:55 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-02-2010, 02:30 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-02-2010, 03:44 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by thefool - 06-01-2010, 10:19 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-02-2010, 05:13 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-03-2010, 03:30 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-03-2010, 04:31 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 06:21 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-04-2010, 10:40 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 11:23 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 12:45 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 12:57 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 06:26 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-05-2010, 01:59 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-04-2010, 11:54 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 12:31 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-03-2010, 06:07 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-03-2010, 06:30 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by LsavedSmeD - 06-05-2010, 12:18 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-05-2010, 12:30 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-04-2010, 09:48 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 09:55 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-04-2010, 11:18 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 08:27 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by crystl37 - 06-04-2010, 10:17 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-04-2010, 10:22 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-05-2010, 11:34 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-05-2010, 12:07 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-05-2010, 07:12 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-06-2010, 03:04 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-07-2010, 11:41 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-07-2010, 12:39 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-07-2010, 06:14 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by crystl37 - 06-05-2010, 07:53 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-05-2010, 11:26 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by crystl37 - 06-06-2010, 07:06 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-06-2010, 08:23 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 06-06-2010, 11:58 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by xlsander - 06-07-2010, 05:25 AM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-08-2010, 12:09 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-07-2010, 01:28 PM
    RE: Failure of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-07-2010, 03:30 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-08-2010, 03:29 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-08-2010, 03:07 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-08-2010, 03:30 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-09-2010, 05:34 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-09-2010, 11:03 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-08-2010, 09:54 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-08-2010, 08:51 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 10:46 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-09-2010, 11:33 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 12:12 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-09-2010, 11:02 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 11:06 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-09-2010, 12:09 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-09-2010, 12:46 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 01:22 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-09-2010, 06:53 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-09-2010, 07:20 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-10-2010, 07:38 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 06-10-2010, 12:33 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Turtle - 06-10-2010, 04:39 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-10-2010, 11:50 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-10-2010, 02:36 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Aaron - 06-10-2010, 02:21 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Truth_and_Love - 06-10-2010, 02:38 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-10-2010, 03:04 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Aaron - 06-10-2010, 03:40 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-10-2010, 03:50 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-11-2010, 05:13 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 08:42 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 11:22 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-11-2010, 11:40 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 11:56 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Ali Quadir - 06-11-2010, 03:13 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 07:10 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 08:39 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 08:59 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 09:10 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 09:22 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 09:51 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 09:57 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 10:05 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Cyclops - 06-11-2010, 10:27 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 06-11-2010, 10:34 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 06-11-2010, 11:32 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by thefool - 06-12-2010, 09:29 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Richard - 06-12-2010, 12:08 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by lightning - 07-09-2010, 09:06 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Joseph326 - 07-02-2010, 06:11 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Pablísimo - 07-09-2010, 03:41 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 03:49 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by airwaves - 07-12-2010, 12:59 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-12-2010, 01:05 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by airwaves - 07-12-2010, 01:18 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-12-2010, 01:58 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 08:19 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 09:24 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 10:51 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 11:38 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 12:03 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 12:10 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 12:16 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 12:50 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 12:54 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 01:04 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 01:53 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 02:46 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:06 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 03:14 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:20 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 03:39 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:44 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-17-2010, 03:48 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-17-2010, 03:50 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by airwaves - 07-17-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-19-2010, 10:32 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 07-20-2010, 06:17 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 07-20-2010, 11:53 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by yossarian - 02-11-2011, 10:01 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 02-11-2011, 10:23 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by yossarian - 02-12-2011, 12:32 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by kycahi - 02-12-2011, 12:45 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-10-2011, 06:42 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Confused - 09-10-2011, 06:45 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by zenmaster - 09-10-2011, 01:35 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-10-2011, 01:54 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-12-2011, 11:40 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Monica - 09-12-2011, 02:42 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by 3DMonkey - 09-10-2011, 10:12 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-12-2011, 12:03 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by kycahi - 09-12-2011, 12:43 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-12-2011, 12:49 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oceania - 09-12-2011, 02:56 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Unbound - 09-20-2011, 12:26 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 09-20-2011, 12:36 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Oldern - 09-20-2011, 06:14 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by unity100 - 09-21-2011, 05:54 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by zenmaster - 09-20-2011, 08:35 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by βαθμιαίος - 09-20-2011, 08:55 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Tenet Nosce - 09-21-2011, 03:33 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by fr33d0m - 12-08-2011, 09:37 PM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Plenum - 07-29-2012, 09:25 AM
    RE: 2006.01.01 'Failure' of the plan that this logos chose - by Siren - 07-29-2012, 09:58 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode