negative wanderers

[Lighthead]

Well,  I'd tend to see the progression in behavior from STS  entities to change substantially from density to density.  A 4D would be full of love-of-self,  but it would not be tempered with wisdom.   IE,  a knowledge of the higher systems in place.   It would probably be more likely to utilize violence or simply disregard free will in others, and have little concept (or regard) for the consequences of its actions.   I think a "classic"  psychopath would fall into this category.

A 5D STS would be very cold and calculating,  a Master Schemer type,  focused on spreading negativity for personal gain through more indirect methods.   I imagine a being something like Hannibal Lector,  especially in the new TV show.   Hannibal isn't overly concerned with converting anyone to his way of thinking (besides a couple characters he sees as being already like him) and is mostly just a bastard for the sake of being a bastard and seeing what he can pull off.

So then the reason that I put Rand in 6D is that she was VERY interested in conversion.  I'd have to go hunting for the quote,  but I remember specifically Ra referring to 6D entities as seeing reproduction in terms of osmosis.  IE, for a STS entity,  this would be a Borg-like drive to expand INTO others and control them through willing conversion.  Also -without getting into needless detail- Rand's own sex life suggests a complete lack of interest in children and use of sex (via BDSM games) as a form of energy transfer.  This also tracks to what Ra said about 6D entities.

More or less,  I think a 4D-neg would be far too self-obsessed and irrational to expend as much energy on others as Rand was willing to.  She (in my estimations) saw the energy expenditure as an investment in others for the sake of trying to enslave them to her,  which would be beyond the capabilities or interests of a 4D or 5D being.  

(And thanks for the offer,  but in honesty - no offense intended - I really don't put much stock in astrology or numerology.  But if it works for you on your path,  don't let me deter you!  )

Well, I don't fail to hazard the chance that you may be right; I don't claim my system to be infallible. It may be completely wrong. She may well be a 6D Wanderer. The only thing is that, according to Ra, there may only be a handful of 6D negative Wanderers, at the most. It's also important to remember that an STS Wanderer could very well forget his/her mission here on Earth to polarize for the negative, and perhaps end up polarizing positive. In other words, it's important to remember that they are not purely from their home density, but very much reflect the qualities of the density they are incarnated into (3rd density). This may tend to eclipse, to a great deal, the vibrations of their home density. Also, Ra didn't put much emphasis in describing how an STS Wanderer would reflect its home density's vibrations.

As far as not wanting your density calculation done, no biggie. I just thought that it would be nice to at least offer it since you were generally asking about it. Whatever floats your boat.