08-07-2010, 04:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-07-2010, 04:58 PM by Questioner.)
From Colmer:
His idea of the Gallery as tunable through water is intriguing, as is his overall theory about the Pyramid having a pair of positive and negative elements. Interesting that he refers to the relieving chamber assemblies as batteries, while Herschel refers to the known relieving chamber as a capacitor. Raising and lowering an object or person from entry to King's Chamber by changing water level in the Gallery would be simpler and more elegant than my pulley idea.
I agree that the "oh no earth changes flood!" and Ark of the Covenant material seems to distract from his points about the Pyramid.
Quote:Every angle and line had a specific origin that has nothing to do with specific star positions, but more to do with harmonics, geometry and the relation to the earths mass and distance from the sun.He seems to say that there has to be one purpose or the other for the design. Either the design was to align the shafts with specific star positions, OR the design was to match geometric and harmonic patterns. I don't see a need to suppose that the design can't brilliantly serve both purposes.
His idea of the Gallery as tunable through water is intriguing, as is his overall theory about the Pyramid having a pair of positive and negative elements. Interesting that he refers to the relieving chamber assemblies as batteries, while Herschel refers to the known relieving chamber as a capacitor. Raising and lowering an object or person from entry to King's Chamber by changing water level in the Gallery would be simpler and more elegant than my pulley idea.
I agree that the "oh no earth changes flood!" and Ark of the Covenant material seems to distract from his points about the Pyramid.