(08-01-2015, 04:31 PM)Diana Wrote: I would like to add one more thing. Many here have conjectured that animals have agreed to our food relationship and the suffering they undergo on our behalf.
But doesn't it make infinitely more sense that that is what plants have done, rather than animals, if it was done at all? And that eating animals is just what's left over from 2D predator/prey behavior, which, because there is a blurry rather than clear demarcation line between 2D and 3D behaviors, is still being acted out in 3D?
Exactly! I am amazed that the same people saying animals want to be killed and eaten, then turn around and say that plants don't want to be eaten.
It makes more sense to me (based on simple observation) that plants do indeed want to be eaten! They are so obviously designed to be eaten!
They don't die when parts of them are harvested, but just keep growing back.
Their seeds are propagated when animals consume them.
They don't have the physiology to experience pain.
They don't have the physiology to flee from predators.
They feed all animal life, whether directly or indirectly.
They contain all the nutrients needed by the human body.
They are known to heal the human body from the diseases caused by animal 'foods'.
These are clues!
Whereas, we KNOW that animals don't want to be killed! There is NO question about that.
...