I don't think I can really explain myself at this point so I'm not really going to try. I feel like I've said all that's relevant to my standpoint.
However, I do have one last question. If eating meat is inherently STS (do you still believe that?) AND has karmic repercussions, whyyy would Ra still suggest to Carla to eat meat without any mention of these apparent consequences? Why would they suggest something that she would clearly realize is harmful to other beings?
Not even just suggesting to do it once, but 'occasionally' in order to help keep her vital energy up. If it was so inherently negative why wouldn't Ra mention any of those consequences after or during their suggestion? It just doesn't add up to me. They do not express any of this emotional content that you are putting in to it. (Not saying that's wrong, just a difference I noticed.)
Why would Ra suggest to Carla to 'occasionally' not be STO?
However, I do have one last question. If eating meat is inherently STS (do you still believe that?) AND has karmic repercussions, whyyy would Ra still suggest to Carla to eat meat without any mention of these apparent consequences? Why would they suggest something that she would clearly realize is harmful to other beings?
Not even just suggesting to do it once, but 'occasionally' in order to help keep her vital energy up. If it was so inherently negative why wouldn't Ra mention any of those consequences after or during their suggestion? It just doesn't add up to me. They do not express any of this emotional content that you are putting in to it. (Not saying that's wrong, just a difference I noticed.)
Why would Ra suggest to Carla to 'occasionally' not be STO?