[split] "Some people eat animals, some don't."

[Monica]

The opportunity of choice arrives in 3rd density. You have compared the plight of animals to the plight of a seemingly helpless female married to john.

No, you have misunderstood.

The question was about the process of polarizing. I gave the analogy to illustrate.

I wasn't comparing the abused woman with abused animals. That wouldn't have been a good analogy, because the woman has the resources to get out of her situation, whereas the animals don't. You are correct that she has choice in this case, whereas the animals don't. (That's Not to say that animals are incapable of choice! They certainly are! But they don't have any choice regarding their enslavement, whereas the modern woman in this analogy does.)

Rather, I was comparing the abuser of the woman (who knowingly continues the abuse even after his eyes are opened to the equality of women, whom he had previously thought inferior, due to the way he was raised) to the meat-eater (who knowingly continues to support the abuse of animals, even after his/her eyes have been opened to the suffering of animals, the sentience of animals, and the needlessness of eating meat/dairy).

The consequence of evolving to 3rd density involves being individuated from the group. That means you are isolated, alone, separate, in an intellectual context.

There is no question that farm animals are individuated. Suffering facilitates self-awareness.

But then, so does love.

Which would we rather impose upon them?

Animals do not have that perspective, neither (according to Ra) do they suffer the consequences of a self individuated perspective.

Ra never said that they lacked that perspective.

Isolation is not of 2nd density, is it not?

Of course it is. Just look at the pigs in their crates, unable to even turn around for their entire lives. Look at the veal calves, torn from their mothers and stuck in a dark crate, and kept malnourished so their meat will be more tender. That is indeed isolation.

If you meant the awareness of isolation, then that too most certainly exists in 2D (late 2D, Not early 2D).

To say that isolation is not of 2D, is like saying love is not of 3D.

Love does exist in 3D, does it not?

Being the criteria for graduation to 4D doesn't preclude it from existing in 3D! Just as self-awareness being the criteria for graduation to 3D doesn't preclude it from existing in 2D.

In fact, love and self-awareness MUST exist in 3D and 2D, respectively, in order to allow time to develop and refine those qualities to the level sufficient for harvesting.

One does Not simply go from 0 to 51% in an instant.

...