[split] "Some people eat animals, some don't."

[upensmoke]

dude i think the major disagreement is that your mind state and actions seem to fall under the identity of STS using the LOO as a reference while you claim its its STO. An STO bias only towards humans is an STS bias towards all other entities not seen as humans. All STS indviduals see the inherent one-ness in all things. Because they see this One-ness Some think it doesn't matter to cause suffering or ignore suffering. First, it doesnt matter to cause this suffering or ignore this suffering because all is one and there is no right or wrong. But feel that based off of what i read your perception of the identity of your polarity is distorted to falsity in regards to meat eating.

Ra: I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only IDENTITY. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator.

Polarity exists in intent. You judge what polarizes myself based off your own heart instead of mine. The reason I do believe it doesn't polarize me negatively is that I also do not think being vegan would polarizes myself positively as of now. Now the impact of this usually stagnant energy and what I make of it is an another matter in itself.

I do not believe I have preferences about humans, there exists sufferings across this entire world I am not doing anything about. You seem to think I feel no compassion toward animals whatsoever, what I meant by being indiferrent is that I do not feel that I am infringing on free will in my meat consumption.

I agree that polarity exist in intent, but i also believe polarity exist in the actual action as well as the outcome of the action, and also the awareness of the entity of the entire situation. I think we fundamentally disagree on the rest besides intent.

also on a personal level i feel the word judge implies a right or wrong attitude as well as an attachment. I feel that the phrase "I perceive what polarizes you based off my own my understanding of the channeling of the Law of One."  would be more accurate on how i feel. I personally do not care if you eat meat and what you believe the polarity of your actions are, im just trying to find an understanding which i felt i have found and continuing to grow

Elros Tar-Minyatur my major disagreement is that extrapolating from your logic as to how your meat eating is either not polorizing or is not STS. You would have been the type of person who would have owned a human slave and say its STO or niether because of the reason that this is his souls choice to be a slave and you as one person freeing their slave won't have any impact on the state of slavery as a whole. Do you agree with this logic ? if not could you explain why. Please and thank you.

I guess I am the kind of person that uses money every day despite thinking it is soaked in blood.

Yes i am too, but I feel money is a bad example, cuz it is just a tool, i feel the idea of paying taxes is a much better example. Our taxes help kill people as well as cause war. I believe every american who pays taxes and is AWARE of the STS aspect of taxes are polarizing to some degree in a STS fashion, and equally everyone who pays taxes and is AWARE of the STO aspects will gain STO Polarity. why do you think the rich are so good at avoiding taxes Lol. 

In conclusion i think the fundamental difference fall to what you believe is actually polarizing compared to what i believe is polarizing to an individual. With that said i believe an entities awareness as well as their intent in choice are the two most important aspects when determining polarization. I know some will disagree.