Well, this is definitely a good way to get things out in to the open. Everybody has opinions. Lots of us here have differing opinions from the Ra Material itself and you'll find a lot of different interpretations. Personally, I view it as a transcription of a conversation. I believe that multiple entities influenced the creation of the conversation but it is ultimately a discussion between two (or three) entities whom are attempting to describe a philosophy.
I do not believe it is infallible and that there were cases where Carla's own mind, perhaps sometimes influenced or disrupted by other entities, likely gave some fair shape to the content, but I do also believe there is a genuine phenomenon of intelligent entities which exists in the universe and it is possible, in my mind, that beings could exist without chemical bodies as we have now. Rather, it is that I believe energy is the only intelligent thing, deriving its intelligence from an infinite potential for intelligence, and that infinite gradations of that energy are 'translated' in to beings by the perception of other beings. Intelligence interacting with itself.
I think Ra exists on their own as an entity, but I don't believe the conversation was without its hiccups. Do I believe in the core philosophy of unity? I'd say that it makes sense within a framework, but not if it is given to chaos because then it doesn't need to make sense. It is dangerous in some ways because it creates a lot of big ideas in the mind which can be difficult for many people to digest and many have had bad reactions in this way but it's hard to say whether or not that is because the material is a certain way or because those people are a certain way.
In conclusion I would invite you to question, question lots and thoroughly. Questions are great and made easier when there is no expectation of a certain answer. Philosophy is ultimately what the Law of One is about so there is a certain personal finesse that goes in to making use of any part of it I'd think.
Or maybe we're all loony, you never reallly know.
I do not believe it is infallible and that there were cases where Carla's own mind, perhaps sometimes influenced or disrupted by other entities, likely gave some fair shape to the content, but I do also believe there is a genuine phenomenon of intelligent entities which exists in the universe and it is possible, in my mind, that beings could exist without chemical bodies as we have now. Rather, it is that I believe energy is the only intelligent thing, deriving its intelligence from an infinite potential for intelligence, and that infinite gradations of that energy are 'translated' in to beings by the perception of other beings. Intelligence interacting with itself.
I think Ra exists on their own as an entity, but I don't believe the conversation was without its hiccups. Do I believe in the core philosophy of unity? I'd say that it makes sense within a framework, but not if it is given to chaos because then it doesn't need to make sense. It is dangerous in some ways because it creates a lot of big ideas in the mind which can be difficult for many people to digest and many have had bad reactions in this way but it's hard to say whether or not that is because the material is a certain way or because those people are a certain way.
In conclusion I would invite you to question, question lots and thoroughly. Questions are great and made easier when there is no expectation of a certain answer. Philosophy is ultimately what the Law of One is about so there is a certain personal finesse that goes in to making use of any part of it I'd think.
Or maybe we're all loony, you never reallly know.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)