10-07-2016, 05:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2016, 05:44 PM by Chandlersdad.)
(10-07-2016, 12:03 PM)YinYang Wrote: Well, some of the worst "teachers" I have ever lent an ear to, did actually teach me loads, just not what they intended to teach me. How can you know one thing without knowing the other? How can you recognise a good teacher, if you have no idea what a bad teacher looks like?
And so it is with all in life, you can only appreciate something if you are intimately familiar with its antithesis.
PS. My post is not aimed at Scott anymore, just the teacher/guru/charlatan phenomenon which is so ubiquitous. Nowadays when I see the crowds running in one direction, I know to go the other way.
Well, I still do not understand why you won't do me the honor of going through my document. You supposedly already know the Ra Law of One. You are not a novice.
Therefore, you are in a perfect position to go through the material to evaluate Scott's teaching skills PUTTING ASIDE HIS OBVIOUS 4TH CHAKRA BLOCKAGE THAT LEADS HIM TO JUDGE OTHERS SO HARSHLY.
You may find a lot of wisdom there. I am sure there is no danger that you or anyone who knows the material already is going to be seduced into believing that Ra rode into Egypt 11000 years ago as golden humanoids riding pink ostriches. You are totally dismissing all my hard work because Scott has an obvious character trait issue that he refuses to even acknowledge. Who cares?
Check out the writing about various aspects of the Ra material itself. I think he is quite deep. In fact, often he is TOO deep for me. A good teacher can have a strong ego. It just shows that he is human and amusingly obtuse about his own blockages.
One very popular pop psychology/New Age teacher that falls under this umbrella for me is Wayne Dyer. He often related valuable information, but always had to give himself a strong pat on the back in his books for being a very good boy! You just roll your eyes and let that aspect go. It does not mean nothing he writes is worth while.