06-20-2019, 05:44 PM
(06-19-2019, 03:57 AM)Ray711 Wrote: On the topic of reaching absolute purity in STO, this following quote from Ra is relevant:
Quote:25.6 ▶ Questioner: Could you amplify the meaning of what you said by “failure to accept that which is given?”
Ra: I am Ra. At the level of time/space at which this takes place in the form of what you may call thought-war, the most accepting and loving energy would be to so love those who wished to manipulate that those entities were surrounded, engulfed, and transformed by positive energies.
This, however, being a battle of equals, the Confederation is aware that it cannot, on equal footing, allow itself to be manipulated in order to remain purely positive, for then though pure it would not be of any consequence, having been placed by the so-called powers of darkness under the heel, as you may say.
It is thus that those who deal with this thought-war must be defensive rather than accepting in order to preserve their usefulness in service to others. Thusly, they cannot accept fully what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, that being enslavement. Thusly, some polarity is lost due to this friction and both sides, if you will, must then regroup.
This is worrisome to me, because it implies that simply being loving is not enough to deter negativity, which is precisely the very mindset of the many people here in 3d who scoff at the notion that unconditional love will save the world. Perhaps it's different because 3d is more of an illusion, and the stakes are higher in the battle described by Ra. I'm unsure as to what to think about this, but I think it'd be interesting to open that debate.
You misused the quote. It does not say what you think it says.
The immigrants which are going here and there in this world are not negative 4d+, or even 3d entities. They are not even negative. They are 3d people.
Naturally, they are not offering an enslavement philosophy, or any kind of negative philosophy to the countries which they are immigrating to. Actually, they dont even have a philosophy since they are a random collection of people of radically differing thoughts, religions and persuasions. There isnt even a collective consciousness.
Therefore that quote has no relevance to this subject.
..............
A more appropriate quote is the one about 'war and rumors of war', pertaining to societal upheaval or conflict.
https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=33#15
It has nothing to do with negative or positive nature of immigration as you will see. It has to do with reactions to a societal upheaval or conflict, and the choices can be positive or negative.
Quote:Still, Creation itself seems to be built on concepts of, shall we say, strict immigration control. The well of 4th density positive can't be poisoned with the negativity of those not sufficiently polarized STO, or so seems to be the idea.
That is also incorrect. Any entity within any polarization is free to go anywhere else within the polarity. Actually, a sufficiently balanced entity has no limits on where to go, as we are told.
And the societal divisions and upheaval within the 3d entities of a 3d planet cannot be applied to larger 3d as density or higher densities. There is density difference and comparison becomes ridiculous: It would be like saying '1d cannot immigrate into my country' -> Of course they cant. they are in a totally different state of being in which they cant even move themselves.
That's stretching and mixing the concepts too far.
Quote:Perhaps the important aspect of it is that polarity is relatively transient, and definitely mutable. Someone may not be "good enough" for 4th density positive at one particular point in time, but with enough time and work, anyone and everyone can potentially get there, if they so wish.
Aside from the earlier point, this also is inapplicable: It proposes that the countries/societies which are receiving immigration are 'positive'. And naturally implies that the immigrants are 'negative' - again.
That is generally incorrect.
In our experiential nexus, the immigration-receiving countries are generally negatively formatted social constructs, which not only have these traits within their own societal organization, but also they have a history of forcibly imposing this negativity upon other regions to exploit them to prosper and profit themselves.
On top of that there is a damning quote which tells us that nonpositive, negative leaning or new 3d entities would choose incarnations in which they would be more comfortable, as opposed to positive entities and wanderers going where the trouble is.
So, contrary to what many at times seem to think, there is greater chance of finding 4d positive entities among the people in regions where there are suffering, war, or refugees. And a higher chance of finding new 3d entities or nonpositive/negative ones in comfortable regions of the world.
......
Therefore the framing of immigrants or refugees as 'negative' influences and the immigrant receiving countries as 'positive' societies is a patently false approach.