01-09-2020, 03:48 PM
I think the scenario of souls incarnating as AI sounds implausible, because it would entail that the AI was built into a body that not only mimicked the physical portion of the human body, but also all of the metaphysical aspects involved in making a human what it is. Its energy rays, its chakras, for example. Consciousness. All of that so-called by scientists "junk DNA" that supposedly holds the keys to our higher density bodies. I think it's difficult to separate the physical and the metaphysical parts of our experiences. What is a thought? What is an emotion? Are they more physical or metaphysical? An AI can have a line of code that allows it to read situations and to respond to them in a certain manner, perhaps in a very complex manner, even. But at the end of the day, we could probably analyze its code and conclude what event led to what response exactly, and in what manner.
With a human, from a metaphysical perspective, we know that thoughts have a strong metaphysical component. Thoughts are actual objects or even entities in the metaphysical planes. We've been told by metaphysical entities many times that we are powerful Creators, that what we think becomes a reality, if not in our lives, then elsewhere in infinity. For an AI that was created solely in and for the physical 3rd density plane, trying to replicate what a human is, but without any knowledge of the metaphysical component of what makes a human what it is, it seems impossible to me that such a machine could have everything that we have. Perhaps if it was built by higher density entities... but at that point, is it really a machine, if it's constructed both physically and metaphysically?
There is talk about the Greys being cyborgs; part biological organism, part machine. But the machine part of them came later; their consciousness must come from their biological part. Some people even say that they do abductions precisely for the purpose of studying how to regain the very thing that we have but they lack: their connection to the divine. And these are entities that aren't even fully a machine.
I understand the argument of infinity containing all there is, but it makes sense that there are some limits to infinity, as paradoxical as the statement is. The Creator ceasing to exist or being destroyed, is theoretically a part of infinity. But it's probably not something that has happened or will happen. Well, at least I hope not.
What a mindfuck.
I agree, Glow, intention is very important, and I agree with you too on the idea that technology can be used in many very positive manners. I think that technology entails a certain degree of inherent separation, though. In the mere act of living inside buildings we are engaging in a kind of separation from nature, for example. I'm very thankful to technology for many things, myself. I would have never gotten into spirituality or learned about The Law of One without the Internet. But on the other hand, perhaps we have to rely on the Internet because as a collective consciousness, we humans never learnt to use the akashic records in any way. Perhaps more spiritual societies learn how to get much of their knowledge that way. We cannot know, because humanity became so tainted by negativity, and so separated even from itself (let alone from the divine) that it's difficult to tell what possibilities we are missing out on. We know that if a society believes strongly enough in the divine, higher density entities will go to walk among them and teach them, as Ra did with the Egyptians. This will not happen to us anytime soon, because humanity has become arrogant, we believe we can do everything ourselves, we have become very materialistic, and we turn to science and technology rather than to love or the spiritual. In this state of affairs, it's certainly better to have technology rather than nothing at all, but how much are we missing out on? Wouldn't it be more wonderful if those of Ra landed here, walked among us, and taught us directly, even if our technology was poor?
With a human, from a metaphysical perspective, we know that thoughts have a strong metaphysical component. Thoughts are actual objects or even entities in the metaphysical planes. We've been told by metaphysical entities many times that we are powerful Creators, that what we think becomes a reality, if not in our lives, then elsewhere in infinity. For an AI that was created solely in and for the physical 3rd density plane, trying to replicate what a human is, but without any knowledge of the metaphysical component of what makes a human what it is, it seems impossible to me that such a machine could have everything that we have. Perhaps if it was built by higher density entities... but at that point, is it really a machine, if it's constructed both physically and metaphysically?
There is talk about the Greys being cyborgs; part biological organism, part machine. But the machine part of them came later; their consciousness must come from their biological part. Some people even say that they do abductions precisely for the purpose of studying how to regain the very thing that we have but they lack: their connection to the divine. And these are entities that aren't even fully a machine.
I understand the argument of infinity containing all there is, but it makes sense that there are some limits to infinity, as paradoxical as the statement is. The Creator ceasing to exist or being destroyed, is theoretically a part of infinity. But it's probably not something that has happened or will happen. Well, at least I hope not.

I agree, Glow, intention is very important, and I agree with you too on the idea that technology can be used in many very positive manners. I think that technology entails a certain degree of inherent separation, though. In the mere act of living inside buildings we are engaging in a kind of separation from nature, for example. I'm very thankful to technology for many things, myself. I would have never gotten into spirituality or learned about The Law of One without the Internet. But on the other hand, perhaps we have to rely on the Internet because as a collective consciousness, we humans never learnt to use the akashic records in any way. Perhaps more spiritual societies learn how to get much of their knowledge that way. We cannot know, because humanity became so tainted by negativity, and so separated even from itself (let alone from the divine) that it's difficult to tell what possibilities we are missing out on. We know that if a society believes strongly enough in the divine, higher density entities will go to walk among them and teach them, as Ra did with the Egyptians. This will not happen to us anytime soon, because humanity has become arrogant, we believe we can do everything ourselves, we have become very materialistic, and we turn to science and technology rather than to love or the spiritual. In this state of affairs, it's certainly better to have technology rather than nothing at all, but how much are we missing out on? Wouldn't it be more wonderful if those of Ra landed here, walked among us, and taught us directly, even if our technology was poor?