Negative Polarity & BDSM

[EvolvingPhoenix]

Hi,

I wanted to ask a question about this particular quote in the Law of One regarding bondage:

The yellow ray is a focal and very powerful ray and concerns the entity in relation to, shall we say, groups, societies, or large numbers of mind/body/spirit complexes. This orange — we correct ourselves — this yellow-ray vibration is at the heart of bellicose actions in which one group of entities feel the necessity and right of dominating other groups of entities and bending their wills to the wills of the masters. The negative path, as you would call it, uses a combination of the yellow ray and the orange ray in its polarization patterns. These rays, used in a dedicated fashion, will bring about a contact with intelligent infinity. The usual nature of sexual interaction, if one is yellow or orange in primary vibratory patterns, is one of blockage and then insatiable hunger due to the blockage. When there are two selves vibrating in this area the potential for polarization through the sexual interaction is begun, one entity experiencing the pleasure of humiliation and slavery or bondage, the other experiencing the pleasure of mastery and control over another entity. In this way a sexual energy transfer of a negative polarity is experienced.

So does that mean that anyone who participates in things such as BDSM or S&M  will be heading towards the negative polarity? Even if it's just role playing?

Sexual activity is sacred. I realize most of the people on these forums are entirely male. Women seem to shy away from spiritual discussions because they're quickly outnumbered. There is something you all have to learn about this, but you aren't going to learn it from one another in a state of perversion. You are going to have to listen to a female spiritual master one day (and I am not saying its me). But she's out there. Women just get a bad rep because they themselves engage in the illusion so fiercely in order to survive, and have yet to activate their true inner female divine energy. Which, does not come in the form of pornography, I am sorry to break it to every one.

But all I have to say again is: Sex is sacred. It is not cheap, should not come in the form of prostitution, photographs, videos, etc... It is sacred, and it can be used for ascension/consciousness evolution between two people who are bonded spiritually and emotionally. That bond does not exist between people who are prostituting themselves and receiving money to show you videos of dark forms of sexual activity. Sex is a pure, very pure act. I might sound like a Christian here, but I assure you I do not do labels nor am I religious.

I can honestly say that engaging in pornography as opposed to exploring the possibility of complete and total "soul fusion" through sacredly practiced sex, will in the end, keep you on the negative path. Porn is DE-sentiziing to the soul, and it is poison. Men tell themselves (actually, their egos tell them) about a thousand lies to justify it and call it wholesome. This is huge part of why the world WILL NOT be ascending. We need a female teacher in this world, desperately.

It does not matter that you are not a Christian, are not religious and do not bother with labels. You recognize that you "sound like a Christian" because you unconsciously or semi-consciously recognize that, just like many Christians are taught to do, you are REPRESSING sexuality and disguising your self denial as some sort of preference for positivity, when really, you just don't like that shadow "prostitute" aspect of yourself. That is why you realize you sound like a Christian.

Here's a few clues for you: a) you label perversions as "perversions" B) You prescribe your preferred and supposedly "positive" sexual practice beginning with the words "should not" (which are inherently negative) when describing negative ones, c) You feel negative practices need justification (they do not. They need only honest assessment as to why one does them to be useful) and d) you somehow mix into the discussion your self-projected sexism, thinking the world "desperately needs" a female teacher or that 'we'll (I love this next choice of words you seriously thought were positive) "will one day HAVE TO listen to a female teacher"

No we don't, and no we won't.

We do not "have to" do anything, there is no "should" or "should not" and the genitalia of an illuminated being is of little difference. Only their TRUTH is what is important and there is no truth that is of gravely serious import for harvest that a female can attain which a male cannot, and vice versa. The structure of consciousness, as Reaper has pointed out, is the same regardless.

Oh, and on top of that, you believe listening to a female teacher is the necessary prerequisite to BDSM going out of style, which is bullshit.

Ra himself put it best: "Desire is to be accepted and understood"

Does ANY of what you just wrote sound like acceptance and understanding of such desire to you?

Can you HONESTLY say it is?

Probably not, because as you have shown in the prior post, you cannot currently "honestly" say anything about the subject matter. Not so long as you are being dishonest with yourself. The fact that you express such clear judgement about it is an indicator that this very desire has some sort of place within you that you are rejecting and suppressing. What do you think will happen to the desire as you continue to do that? I may have problems, but repressing my sexuality is at least thankfully not one of them.

Negative practices need no justification (except when trying to avoid social consequence) and the divine carries no judgement on the matter. Only the self might.

I used to be into BDSM but I have largely lost my taste for it as a natural result of my healing process. It's just plain not as interesting as it once was to me, because I have accepted that desire and now I accept newer desires for more intimate connection. I still accept those desires which are different however, and feel no need to "justify: anything, because I HAVE no need to "justify" anything.

We do not need teachers of any particular race, ethnicity, gender or whatever.

What is important is that whoever teaches, is HONEST in their teachings.

I do not perceive honesty in what you just wrote.

Just self-deception, sexual repression, projected sexism and general shaming mechanisms at play.

If I had taken YOUR approach to BDSM, I would undoubtedly have an even bigger fetish for it than I used to have (rather than no longer feeling it has much appeal anymore like I do now), but then again I'm a male, so I guess that invalidates my opinion. Whatever.