03-03-2020, 05:49 PM
(03-03-2020, 05:47 PM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: I honestly have a hard time getting your analogy here, so forgive any possible misinterpretation. To be frank, I'm not really sure what you're on about right now. However, I shall respond to the best of my ability.
Okay, here goes....
"1+1=3 is not about my decision, my decision, my will, is to verify it or don't verify it (i.e. to accept blind faith)."
Listen, you asked a SUBJECTIVE question: "What is the fruit? (of the Law of One material)" and I tasked you with taking the prerequisite personal responsibility of interpreting this subjective question yourself. Why? Because it is a SUBJECTIVE question. You dislike the answer it seems, so you retort with the implication that an objective answer exists. ("2+2 does not equal 3") You did NOT ask an objective question there, so you cannot assert an objective answer. If you feel you HAVE the answer aleady, there is no point in asking, unless it was not truly a question, in which case please feel free to start arguments with somebody else.
Nonetheless, I told you what the subjective answer is FOR ME. That is all anybody outside yourself can tell you when you ask a subjective question like "What is the fruit of the Law of One material?"
Moving on...
"I claim the polarization of STO/STS is not primary but secondary matter. The primary matter is subject, who serves to self/others (see John 8:42)"
Polarization is the process of you answering that question for yourself.
"Let's suppose I give you some great car* (an EU car, I am from EU, sorry). It is your first car and you are enthusiastic about it. I'll teach you how to drive but give you the instruction that the most important matter is the manual gear, gearing, not the road, the road is secondary. If you believe me, it'll kill you one day. I don't need to kill you myself, you will kill yourself and you will even be thankful for me."
This is what I'm talking about when I say I don't get your analogy. The way I see it, presence is the equivalent of paying attention to the road when you are driving, and THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE COMPILATION of L/L Research books, Ra and other Confederation sources emphasize AD NAUSEUM the importance of presence, awareness and meditation.
I don't know what in your analogy you consider to be the equivalent of advising you to pay attention to the road, but surely, you can see how emphasizing the importance of presence and mindfulness is a good guess and makes a s*** ton of sense.
"Yes, but he also indicated the unimportance of some question (3.6). When the Ra saw strong interest in pyramids (because healing) he discouraged of it (4.8) and he didn't see disrespecting free will of such advise. Because it was implicitly evolved in the intention of the questioners (if the Ra wouldn't direct them and answered such kind of questions they could spent maybe theirs lives in it as a pyramid creators e.g.)"
I don't know what questions you in your infinite wisdom believe Ra was responsible for answering unasked, but the truth is, that is for Ra to decide, not you.
I mean, you are free to your own opinion, but it seems you are arguing with me as to how Ra should have best gone about doing whatever job you think Ra's job was. I don't really know how you figure your deliberately limited 3D understanding is somehow more competent than Ra's at figuring out the appropriate guidelines for not violating Confederation rules or breaking the Law of Confusion.
Hopefully though, when ypu reach late 6th density, you will have a betyer go of it.
You can choose to trust Ra's judgement or not on the matter but where you put your trust is your decision.
I really cannot answer for you why you should trust or care about anything Ra says or even why you should believe that the LOO material was a legitimate channeling, or whether it was a con, hoax, or delusional fantasy on the parts of Jim, Don and Carla or whatever. Again, that is up to you.
"Don was (physically) seriously ill and we can suppose all group wanted Don's health."
And?
"And the Ra answered some useless questions about a cat…"
Because that is what was asked.
Seems to me that you are essentially reading Jim, Carla and Don's spiritual Google search results and expressing dissatisfaction with the fact that the search query: "What's up with my cat?"
Didn't have a thing at the top saying "Did you mean 'What's up with Don's health?'"
And at that, we move onto the next bit:
"If you know in my boot is a scorpion inside and I want to put the boot on, don't you warn me?"
If I am a channeled late 6D being whose purpose is to answer your questions about spiritual evolution (and not to act as your babysitter) then no. That would defeat the point of you going on the journey to begin with. Ra is not supposed to give you the spoilers to your story. And if you are the questioner, it is not Ra's responsibility to ask your questions for you either.
"Because I am babbling something, didn't ask the right question and have free will?""
Yes, EXACTLY because that. Ra is not a 3D companion tasked with removing obstacles from your journey.
Ra is a source of information regarding the One-ness of all things (to the best of his late 6D understanding) and the evolution of consciousness through the first 6 out of 7 densities within the octave.
It would NOT be appropriate for Ra to warn you that a scorpion is in your boot without your consent.
Ra's function in these channelings is less like that of a babysitter and more like that of an encyclopedia.
Just because the encyclopedia is sapient doesn't mean it was a dick move on the encyclopedia's part not to inform you of the spider in your boot. That is neither it's function, nor it's purpose in the affair.
As for how you can expect to find out there is a scorpion in your boot, there are 2 ways as I see it: 1 PAY ATTENTION and look in your boot, or b) don't pay attention
and find out unexpectedly.
Remember when you emphasized the importance of paying attention to the road in your analogy?
Well, Ra can't pay attention to the road for you and is not your GPS.
As for whether you could have known to pay attention to the road or not, again, the constant heavy emphasis on meditation and presence is that advice.
If you want an OBJECTIVE ANSWER as to why you must graduate 51+% positive or 95+% negative, the closest thing to an objective answer I can think of would be because those are the rules in this part of reality and you chose to subject yourself to them before incarnating.
Why did you do that? None but you can answer that.
Why are those the rules?
Well... As Ra said: "This not the density of understanding."
So don't expect a "2+2=4" type of answer. 3rd density is not the most suitable density for understanding that.
Still, if I were to make a guess, I theorize that maybe it is because that is the least amount of polarity needed for you to find clarity and meaning in your next stages of your spiritual seeking.
Remember Ra warning us about the dangers of attempting to graduate before you are truly ready?
It seems you do not.
In the LOO material, they asked about Hitler and Ra said Hitler drove himself insane trying to polarize too quickly and while essentially negative, his soul was deeply confused and his negativity was not of service to the creator. Seems that is what happens when you attempt to graduate without adherence to the whole "51+% STO or 95+% STS, thing.
So that seems like a pretty good clue as to why it's gotta be at least those percentages.
This is the best I can currently do to answer these questions.
If I misunderstood them, my apologies for the confusion. I answered your questions as best as I could with the best understanding of what you were asking that I was able to work with.
Quote:1+1=3 is not about my decision,ROFLMAO