03-03-2020, 06:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2020, 07:26 PM by EvolvingPhoenix.)
(03-03-2020, 05:37 PM)isis Wrote:(03-03-2020, 05:32 PM)kraken99 Wrote: As I can understand, according the Ra it is better to be polarized even to the negative path than not to be polarized.
that's the part i find extremely retarded
Look man, from what I can tell, the STS path runs on a kind of logic/philosophy so alien to most positive seekers that out of ignorance, people tend to just assume negative polarization is "retarded" when in reality, their understanding of the subject matter is too limited to make a competent assessment as to it's merits. Dunning Kruger effect in action.
Writing off something as "retarded" simply because you find it hard to understand is of no service to yourself OR others.
I would remind you however that we once did not have free will. Because we did not have free will, we did not have the OPTION of negativity. Because of that fact, the meaning we fpund in our positivity was perceived as less rich it seems than it is now that we have free will.
This is why we have free will, and therefor why the STS option is considered preferable I would think to no change. Maybe Im wrong, but that's my guess.
If you TRULY preffered stagnation to the possibility of your free will being enacted, I suspect you would not be here in the first place.
Still, you have the option of living without making use of your free will if you choose. According to Ra (when asked) that was like what? HALF of humanity?
Be warned though: the more you refuse oppprtunities for positive polarization, the less they appear, according to Ra. Don't get me wrong: I myself have lived a life not realizing my true will, but that too was a choice I guess. Who knows? Besides, this positive harvest and thinning veil swem to make it easier to manifest thise opportunities, so no pressure.
Point being though, that the STS path exists in large part it seems because serving as a contrast to the STO path helps give more meaning and substance to the STO path. Of what use would this be if one did not actually have a serious option and possibility for choosing the STS path?
Well, actually, my point is that you really can't expect to competently judge the merits of a choice you do not understand can you?