03-03-2020, 06:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2020, 06:58 PM by AnthroHeart.)
I don't recall Ra saying that it's bad to not be polarized.
They called it the sinkhole of indifference, but didn't say it's worse than negative polarization.
4D negative is as close to hell as I can imagine. So how's that better than repeating a 3D cycle?
Although 3D can seem like hell at times too.
They called it the sinkhole of indifference, but didn't say it's worse than negative polarization.
4D negative is as close to hell as I can imagine. So how's that better than repeating a 3D cycle?
Although 3D can seem like hell at times too.
(03-03-2020, 05:37 PM)isis Wrote:(03-03-2020, 05:32 PM)kraken99 Wrote: As I can understand, according the Ra it is better to be polarized even to the negative path than not to be polarized.
that's the part i find extremely retarded