(03-05-2020, 09:47 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: If you consider not being noticed to be the very same thing as taking control. It provides a means to use towards that end, if that's what you're gerting at, but is not in and of itself that end.
Regardless, you are using analogies to explain analogies to explain analogies. You make no attempt to explain the connection and make it clear what you are driving at. I cannot help you if you do not clarify your statements and if you view these statements as having some sort of purpose towards teaching others, you clearly do not care enough to clarify it to people not getting it, and none outside yourself run on the assumption anything you have to say is important enough that we must decode the confusing and (loosely at best) connected analogies.
I cannot help you answer your questions if you do not communicate your thoughts clearly, nor do I seek your wusdom or guidance. So I aint bothering to decode this kinda messy assortment of analogies.
You posed the question of what the fruit of the LOO was. I answered what fruit it has beared for me and tasked you with the responsibility of deciding for yourself what fruit it bears for you.
Clearly, this question was not asked in earnest seeking of an answer, but as a means of trying to assert an opinion nobody solicited.
I get why one would be frustrated with the transient questions Don asked as being of no use in real spiritual seeking, but at the same time I do not personally choose to throw the baby out with the bath water on that one.
As for polarization being of secondary importance to self awareness, I agree. If you are attempting to assert that the LOO material can be counterproductive in the seeking of individuals not just because it distracts them from the important task of self awareness with trivial bullshit Don wanted to include to sell the book, but also because it focuses more upon the graduation to harvest with stupid bullshit like percentage points and "making the grade" I also agree with you, but find your means of articulating these ideas to be unnecessarily confusing and counter productive. Poor English is no excuse because it is not your English that's the problem, but your approach. One could even say that if these are the points you are actually driving at (and I am not just giving you too much credit) that you are in fact mirroring the very flaws you find with Ra and the L/L group's approach: distract from the true meat of what you are trying to get across by overemphasizing stuff which does not matter. A clear and consice approach would have been more useful on both ends amd more productive.
As for your assertion that I am one of Orion, whatever dude. Believe whatever suits your ego, I don't give a s***.
Is there any other point you are trying to make here, or some sort of clarification you need on something? If not, I'm done discussing this further.
The fruit of the Law of One material is ultimately baried from individual to individual because differsnt individuals choose what they get out of it. I chose to get a better understanding of how the evolution throughout the densities and a refinement of the concepts which I had realized when I first awakened. Also, it was part of my early steps down the esoteric rabbit hole which helped me find clarity, healing and acvess to magick. That is the fruit I choose to get out of it. Not to mention the way it ultimatelt lead me to very important people on my seeking. A positive ripple effect can also be taken as a fruit beared by the LOO material. It surely is for me.
Others may choose to get nothung but transient information about spacemen, bigfoot, men in black, UFOs and other such things. That is the fruit they have chosen. One does not have to personally find such fruit substantive.
You have chosen to get NOTHING out of the LOO material it seems, so the fruit it bears for YOU is clearly nothing. It is of no use to yourself or others to then say that because you PERSONALLY chose to come away with nothing you deem substantive, means that nobody else can come away with something substantive from it. It is the responsibility of the individual seeker to decide what they choose to take away from it.
EvolvingPhoenix, why so much words?
(03-04-2020, 07:49 AM)EvolvingPhoenix Wrote: "If the scorpion is not enough, how about a professionally hidden antipersonnel mine on my road? Of course I cannot give you my consent to inform me because I am clueless about the mine I am stepping on. Let me die, buddy?"Jesus helped even dead Lazarus. He healed how he could. Will you call him babysitter?
Then I guess your f*****. Oh well too bad. Jesus...
You even don't want give me information that can save my life. And you suppose you are STO. It's crazy.