why Covid-19? what is the spiritual meaning?

[Diana]

Philanthropy, like that of Gates, is a mixed bag. People who are really, really rich (and largely became so rich by being smart in their expressions of selfishness), can make themselves widely loved, and fondly remembered by future generations, by investing a portion of their riches into "good causes". If they're not super-negative at heart, it also makes them feel better, as they can then settle into a new self-image of being heroic.

People who think it's all somehow part of great, ominous plans don't explain how those agendas would suit the rich philanthropists. How would it satisfy Gates personally to be a little pawn in supporting super-evil New World Order plans? And if being a tiny pawn in super-sized evil plans wouldn't satisfy him, then why would Gates bother? I think people like Gates tend to focus much more narrowly, simply, and in relation to the self than is supposed by those who think them key people in grand conspiracies.

You can generally expect people like Gates to funnel some money into causes which are good from the conventional point of view. By conventional standards, that's good deeds. But non-conventionalist analyses can find flaws in the goodness, without bringing alleged larger conspiracies into the picture.

I agree that your above scenario is possible. I don't have a belief one way or the other by the way.

The scenario you painted above is very simplistic about the "super-evil New World Order plans." Logic suggests to me, that If there is a controlling faction at the apex of the pyramid of power who operate under the radar, it's way more complicated—not like a polarized cartoon of good guys and bad guys. And the layers underneath that apex are compartmentalized to ensure that no one knows the entire picture. And, I think those at the apex feel it is their duty to control the masses and I think somewhere Ra says something to that effect. So I think it's possible (and again, I am not entrenched in these ideas, but neither am I going to accept any official narratives without question) that a person like Gates would think whatever he is doing for the world is good while being aware that some of it was for control, such as, yes we must inject nanobots into people for their own good because (fill in whatever narrative he is getting from the upper layers). Humans love to be "in the know" and feel altruistic which plays into this scenario perfectly.

So I am not saying Gates is evil. Everyone's intentions are good from their individual perspectives.

On the other hand, when my nephew was a baby and young boy, he went into convulsions when he got vaccinations. So when my sister was pregnant with her second child, she researched vaccinations. She is an extensive researcher. She refused vaccinations for her second child as a result, and that girl has never had any of the childhood diseases children are vaccinated for. I realize these are individual examples and can't represent the whole population. I'm sorry to say, according to my sister's research, that vaccinations do almost no good (or in some cases none at all) when you actually compare the numbers and details. Of course, there are particular times when diseases such as polio were treated effectively. But in modern-day times, it doesn't look so benevolent. It looks to me like an ideal (possible) vehicle for more control. For my part, after childhood when I didn't have any choice, I have never been inoculated against anything, even tetanus after a car accident and stepping on a roofing nail etc., because I trust my own body to deal with things. On the other hand, I'm not so rigid as to deny care when it is indicated.

All I can say is that if there is a mandatory vaccination, it would be crossing the line and suspicious. Hopefully it won't be enforced.