Do higher density beings get free thought?

[unity100]

This reminds me, more loosely, of some old metaphysical speculation I did 10 years ago. The core idea is that limitation defines structure, structure is defined by limitations.

Then I went on to consider 7D in terms of an empty set of limitations. All which is smaller than 7D is then like a non-empty set of limitations. Each such set defines a being or "thing", which is the whole limited by itself to a part of itself.

Indeed.

In related thinking, Fourth Way cosmology describes how there is a branching out into seven cosmoses, proceeding from unity, like a recursive definition (with a threshold limiting how many levels it can go). Each "lower" cosmos which emerges has more laws/limitations/division-of-wills than the previous, and includes the limitations of the previous along with more.

Growth from a lower cosmos to a higher cosmos (and each pair is also like a microcosm and a macrocosm) is the overcoming of a set of laws/limitations

Overcome is an incorrect word.

The limitations/structures which are found in any given subset are what define that given subset. The structure itself, and the accompanying limitations, are a manifestation of that subset of infinity which expresses its nature. They are not overcome, but experienced and then encompassed.

As the entity encompasses a given subset, it becomes larger in vision and encompassing, able to exist as a larger subset of existence and therefore encompass more subsets. This goes all the way to infinity when all subsets are encompassed and no subset is encompassed - due to the nature of infinity.


halving the number which the being is subject to and through that, gaining new freedom to "be" in a more expansive way. Until there's only three laws left, at the cosmos corresponding to 6D. Of course, the cosmos after, that of unity, has only one law.

The difference between that and my thinking is the general nature of the Fourth Way idea, which only captures different levels of being, compared to extending the idea to make for a unique set of limitations defining each unique sub-creation identifiable in the creation. And as each thing is defined in relation to the whole, included is the idea that the mode of interaction for ongoing change, and possibilities for transformation, follow from each set.

I think the journey into the end can be thought of as a single-pointed focus.

There is no end and there is no beginning. There is one single focus and there are infinite number of infinite focuses. There is focus and there never was a focus.

At point infinity, everything holds true and everything is invalid at the same time. Everything completes each other to absolute balance, canceling out each other. And then again, everything imbalances each other and causes each other to exist.

It all beings and ends in mystery as Ra says. Then again it doesnt, because even mystery itself is a concept that is identifiable. So there must be an equal and opposite counterpart which totally cancels it out. Then again, at the same time, not.