Removing the veil of separation

[Sena]

The main veil as I see it, is the veil of seeming separation. And that it's a necessary veil for the purpose of growth and development. Evil is in my view a result of the veil and so is entropy (disorder/deterioration). Removing the veil removes the evil.

Anders, I am not sure about this. I am also new to the Law of One, and I could be wrong. Ra has said that STS entities will continue to operate (on STS planets) until they reach 6th density. If they reach 6th density, the veil must have been removed, but they will continue to be evil.

P.S.
In the following quote, Carla seems to be saying that we should refrain from labelling individuals as evil:

A service-to-self polarizing person will likely have much more
control over what he says and does than will a positively polarizing
person. He will be attentive to details which might gain him an
advantage or give him ways to control others’ thoughts or actions
more efficiently. You can label such people as evil, but all that does
is embroil you in the lower-case gameboard, which loves to judge
and make differences between oneself and others which make the
self look “better than.”
When you try to use the words, “good and evil” in looking at
polarity’s dynamic opposites, you may find that those words carry
too much emotional charge to be useful for investigation. It is
better for the purposes of thinking about these concepts to use the
terms positive and negative, as with magnetic poles. Then there is
no emotional judgment rendered while discussing these concepts.
I am not suggesting that you need to embrace what you consider
evil in the pursuit of unbiased thinking. I am only suggesting that,
in thinking about polarity, it helps to use the neutral terms of
positive and negative rather than good and evil or right and wrong.
Those two sets of dynamics—good and evil and right and
wrong—are relative terms. Different things are good, proper or
right to different people and groups of people. The terms, positive
and negative, being linked to the nature of a polarized magnet,
afford us more nearly objective terms.

https://www.llresearch.org/library/livin...choice.pdf