I find a huge amount of information in the Law of One channeling that fits my overall view. So Ra's information is actually often easy for me to take in, except the more complicated stuff.
Examples are Ra's information about Venus, oneness, intelligent infinity, the veil, higher densities, one infinity and that all paradoxes are resolved on Ra's level. Even before I learned about that I had similar ideas such as paradoxes being incomplete or mistaken understanding rather than actual paradoxes.
Something that I initially disagreed with Ra about was the term service, which I thought was wrong, but I can now see the need for making a distinction between service-to-self and service-to-others. Ra addresses a fairly large audience with people across the spectrum of consciousness development, and STS vs STO is a clear distinction that removes or at least reduces misunderstanding.
Examples are Ra's information about Venus, oneness, intelligent infinity, the veil, higher densities, one infinity and that all paradoxes are resolved on Ra's level. Even before I learned about that I had similar ideas such as paradoxes being incomplete or mistaken understanding rather than actual paradoxes.
Something that I initially disagreed with Ra about was the term service, which I thought was wrong, but I can now see the need for making a distinction between service-to-self and service-to-others. Ra addresses a fairly large audience with people across the spectrum of consciousness development, and STS vs STO is a clear distinction that removes or at least reduces misunderstanding.