What will be with the second density in the transition from third to fourth density?

[MonadicSpectrum]

The selfish, pig-ignorant, stubborn, animalistic response to the covid crisis and needs of other people in their society from certain segments in a decent number of countries, cast doubt over a fast transition.

While various countries like US and UK saw it fit to have their people die to protect the 'economy' (read: stock market), countries like China mobilized entire society to protect even their oldest. The oldest, who were seen 'ok to let them die because it does not effect the economy' in certain countries. An example is that Cummings guy, advisor to PM Boris Johnson in UK. Various major prominent think-thanks in US published similar sociopathy as well.

And the main problem is that this was ok with a large segment of population in both countries.

I can appreciate that perspective, but personally, I see it as a mischaracterization that the choice was/is between the economy and old people. There are ways of effectively protecting old people while allowing those who aren't at risk of permanent harm from the pathogen to continue living their lives and producing goods/services. There is also good evidence that locking down the world economy pushes hundreds of millions to starvation and poverty (suffering over long periods of time) which is arguably much worse than old people dying and proceeding to their next life (assuming you believe in reincarnation).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/202...n-poverty/

Also, I believe China is one of the best societies in the modern world to represent the service-to-self polarity which values loyalty and obedience to authority (control from the top of the hierarchy) over freedom and acceptance of differences (helpful guidance with respect for free will from the top of the hierarchy) which are the values of the service-to-other polarity. Even now, the service-to-self polarity of humanity is seeking control on mass through censorship and mandated medicine across the world rather than offering love and acceptance to those who choose different paths.

83.12 Questioner: Then you say that there are no cases where those who are service-to-others oriented are using in any way techniques of enslavement that have grown as a result of the evolution of our social structures? Is this what you mean?

Ra: I am Ra. It was our understanding that your query concerned conditions before the veiling. There was no unconscious slavery, as you call this condition, at that period. At the present space/time the condition of well-meant and unintentional slavery are so numerous that it beggars our ability to enumerate them.

83.13 Questioner: Then for a service-to-others oriented entity at this time meditation upon the nature of these little-expected forms of slavery might be productive in polarization I would think. Am I correct?

Ra: I am Ra. You are quite correct.

83.14 Questioner: I would say that a very high percentage of the laws and restrictions within what we call our legal system are of a nature of enslavement of which I just spoke. Would you agree with this?

Ra: I am Ra. It is a necessary balance to the intention of law, which is to protect, that the result would encompass an equal distortion towards imprisonment. Therefore, we may say that your supposition is correct. This is not to denigrate those who, in green- and blue-ray energies, sought to free a peaceable people from the bonds of chaos but only to point out the inevitable consequences of codification of response which does not recognize the uniqueness of each and every situation within your experience.