(03-18-2022, 12:37 PM)IndigoSalvia Wrote: I'm reading Quo's https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2022/0302 session. And, contemplating this section.
Quote:However, it is possible, my friends, if one has the bias towards protecting others, and they do so without engaging in attitudes of separation and see the aggressor as the Creator, and yet, do everything in their power to minimize harm in a situation, up to and including using similarly violent acts to prevent further harm, it is possible, yet a rare scenario upon your planet.
We emphasize that this is quite a rare occurrence. For as you may understand, this is an incredibly difficult attitude to maintain within the confusion of third density.
I am stumbling over the bolded sentiment. I can barely (if at all) see - within myself - a path as described above.
Can one act with bellicosity with a full and open heart of love for all ... with no sense of separation? STO compassionate- and loving-bellicosity?
Anybody wish to share your understanding, perspective?
When US bombarded Dresden during WWII or Hiroshima and Nagasaki some in their leading team might have been genuinely (as they claimed) concerned that the fanaticism of the opponents could cause too much destruction with a longer war. So they wanted to destroy their moral to save their bodies. I certainly believe there were some that were more than happy they could test the new weapons or pay it back to Germans.
So as you can see there is an amalgam of reasons and excuses in such situation. Probably after the incarnation ends each will be assessed based on what he/she felt during that action. Some might have felt compassion but believed is the smaller of two evils. Some might have been very happy they can inflict pain on others.