03-22-2022, 09:44 PM
I am reading this session: https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2016/0305.
The question posed to Hatonn is, in essence, how do we balance a desire to both a) honor catalyst (which may bring suffering) as designed in pre-incarnative choices, and b) a desire to relieve suffering.
Hatonn poses many provocative questions to explore ... yet, all within the 3D environment of not truly knowing.
As I consider/meditate on my own desire to relieve suffering in many situations, including Ukraine -- much of it far beyond my "reach" -- this session provides me more ways to view my position/perspective, as I perch in a precarious balancing act.
"How is one ever to know what service befits a circumstance which very likely is so complicated, which very likely is so deeply resonant at levels unseen, that no remedy one has ready can suffice in supplying what is needed."
"Your part is not to try to figure out why the entity suffers, what the lessons could be. Your part is to look upon this entity as one which you may be able to aid, that may play a part in your own growth in providing the service that you feel is potentially helpful in relieving the suffering."
In recognition of what I can not know, I am gently led back to a place of loving light, intelligent and infinite on its own, that may flow through me where it may.
"Learning to love under all possible circumstances is indeed the goal which each of you seeks" in this 3D - not lack of suffering, not happiness.
The question posed to Hatonn is, in essence, how do we balance a desire to both a) honor catalyst (which may bring suffering) as designed in pre-incarnative choices, and b) a desire to relieve suffering.
Hatonn poses many provocative questions to explore ... yet, all within the 3D environment of not truly knowing.
As I consider/meditate on my own desire to relieve suffering in many situations, including Ukraine -- much of it far beyond my "reach" -- this session provides me more ways to view my position/perspective, as I perch in a precarious balancing act.
- Has one (or many) pre-incarnatively chosen the suffering situation in which one/many finds itself? I can not know.
- Will offering this or that service (whether spiritual or physical) have the intended effect? I can not know.
"How is one ever to know what service befits a circumstance which very likely is so complicated, which very likely is so deeply resonant at levels unseen, that no remedy one has ready can suffice in supplying what is needed."
"Your part is not to try to figure out why the entity suffers, what the lessons could be. Your part is to look upon this entity as one which you may be able to aid, that may play a part in your own growth in providing the service that you feel is potentially helpful in relieving the suffering."
In recognition of what I can not know, I am gently led back to a place of loving light, intelligent and infinite on its own, that may flow through me where it may.
"Learning to love under all possible circumstances is indeed the goal which each of you seeks" in this 3D - not lack of suffering, not happiness.