Why are newer channelings important?

[tadeus]

One problem with this is that LLR does not possess a bias in favour of helping people search the material, except by publishing its own guides. 

(1) The website lawofone.info is owned by Tobey Wheelock because he did the work on it, not LLR.
(2) To my knowledge, there is no easy way to search to "other conscious channelings" on the llresearch.org site.  Ergo, if you're new to all this, how can you do what Loki, Tadeus and myself do, namely, search the sessions by key word?
Unless you've stuck around the forums for years, how would know about the pdfs?  I'm not saying LLR's bias is good or bad, just that is exists.

Another problem is that LLR explicitly have the copyright on the channelings (that's of course understandable).
So without an explicit granting to use the texts, it is not possible to open an own public Wiki like lawofone.info.
For each translation of the texts an additional granting of the authors is needed.

A full-text search within the channeling texts has only useful results, when the keyword is not to generic and produces tons of hits.

Specially the channelings ouside of Ra are not numbered and categorized, so here can be done an really enhancement of the content.

Finally, there's the matter of the quality of the questions, which is discussed in the thread referenced in the OP of this thread.  in short, my view is as follows.  L/L Research began as a small band of seekers (whose members would come and go over time) and it was not then a dedicated administrative enterprise.  This has changed to where publishing is the main concern and--in my opinion only--the seeking is done on the leftover time rather than being the most burning concern.  Whereas in the early sessions where Prof. Don Elkins was a key player--as well as Carla Rueckert--the intensity of the seeking might have been much more upfront than it is today.  Again the intensity of the seeking, along the consequent ardour of the queries, are fundamental to increasing the quality of the contact.

Is this a bad thing?  I'd say not.  The work continues.

As you have find out and i already have written there are different qualities by the time and channeling members.

For my part i can only say that everything is good as it is, but i would say that the practice is now very conservative opposite to Carla and Don.
It seems that a deepening of old questions and themes is preferred with a smaller focus of themes then in the history of LLR.

Thanks for the Link to https://harc.otherselvesworking.group