05-15-2011, 02:44 AM
(05-14-2011, 09:35 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: More disastrous?When you are presented with a transcendent figure or principle, you have an 'excuse' to transfer power of reaching that transcendence on your own with the surrogate role unconsciously recognized in the object of transference - the 'ET'. This is because you have before you a successful, manifest example of being that represents something accomplished. You 'identify' with that sufficiency, without having completed the work yourself.
Isn't there plenty already to "transfer" to? Sure, it would be chaotic... on one side of the tracks, the other side would be positively enabled.
So you always ask, in a compulsive manner, 'tell me' the answers. It doesn't matter that the entity is positive or of good will, there is potential avoidance of life's 'problems' or to any would-be catalyst with the expectation of answers from the ET. Just as we 'demand' that the government give us information on the nature of ET's, so we 'demand' to be spoon fed information on anything else that we think we should know. That's why 'disclosure is happening now.' is a joke - an expectation from someone that has put themselves in the passive role as a spectator.