Caring/Compassion/Sensitivity/Tact vs Lying/Faking

[Monica]

it is what it boils down to. therefore, its exactly what you said.

No, it's not. See post #113.

its not ok for us to be blunt, direct and tell that we think someone else is wrong, directly,

but,

its ok for Ra, who is in a position to give authoritative information.

You are oversimplifying.

I will try again:

In a direct teacher/student relationship, with both parties clear as to who is in the position of teacher and who is in the position of student, blunt answers are fine.

But not in a social discussion, in which both parties are on equal footing, such as what we have here.

so you are really saying that if someone is in a position of authoritative information, they are free to ignore the 'compassion' and 'sto behavior' as defined in relevance to not saying 'you are wrong'.

A school teacher telling a child that no, 2+2 doesn't equal 5, isn't being uncompassionate. That is the equivalent of what Ra was doing.

if you faked something, it is faked. you cant redefine it to be non fake.

A person acting from the heart, with love and compassion, isn't faking.

giving the impression to someone else as if you are NOT telling them they are wrong, but, in a veiled fashion telling them they are wrong and trying to get them to reconsider, is, fake, and manipulative.

Depends on the motivation.

yes and then they proceeded to answer with 'no' to paragraphs full of queries, and then not elaborating if asked.

So....? That doesn't negate the genuine caring for Carla. Nor does it prove any sort of lack of compassion.

not to mention direct wording of 'you are wrong' in manner when situation arose.

See post #113.

you are saying that people should fake their responses to appear in non disagreement of others and do not tell that they think that someone/something is wrong in a direct fashion if the person in front of them is someone from united states of america, a place in which some percentage of the population living in the coasts do not like to be told that they are wrong and instead faked for political correctness, out of a problem of not being able to accommodate the many cultures within the mix, and a fear/irritation for hearing the word 'no' or similar rejection/refusal wordage.

then, will the compassionate entity here in this forum, including americans, adjust their attitudes to someone who is joining from tokyo area, and modify their behavior in order to accommodate the cultural undertones japanese society has in greater tokyo area ?

and also for people from bangalore ?

Yes, all compassionate people, acting from the heart with love, WILL make an effort to adjust their approach, to be considerate of others, in whatever small way they are able to. Yes.

See, the part you are missing, is that you are trying to establish a set of rules. That can't be done. Acting from the heart will always find the right response for that particular situation.

all of these, totally leaving out the fact that the 5th ray is defined as the ray of radiation of self, regardless of reactions from others.

But of course one wouldn't want to operate from 5th ray only. ALL the chakras must be balanced. There's a term for higher chakras operating without the foundation of 4th: STS.

ra used the same demeanor while channel-hopping the channels at their time of first contact.

We don't know anything about any other Ra contacts because this is the only one we have recorded.