Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Science & Technology Moon Hoax Not

    Thread: Moon Hoax Not


    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #1
    02-04-2013, 01:50 AM

    Guy examines plausibility of faked moon landings.

      •
    Guardian (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 361
    Threads: 31
    Joined: Sep 2012
    #2
    02-04-2013, 02:33 AM
    I don't see the point of entertaining a moon landing conspiracy discussion. It is probably one of the least fruitful conspiracy theories out there.

      •
    Ashim (Offline)

    All Be One
    Posts: 2,371
    Threads: 144
    Joined: Nov 2009
    #3
    02-04-2013, 03:17 AM (This post was last modified: 02-04-2013, 03:23 AM by Ashim.)
    I think they went to the moon alright, I've seen Buzz and Neil get really mad when the opposite was suggested....BUT....
    they had to fake lots of material for the public in order to not show us the extent of ET presence on luna.
    Kubrick is a genius. LOL at the ipads in 2001. Someone had a peek into the future with a looking glass?
    The de-bunking as usual has more holes in it than the original conspiricy.
    I'm sure the video tech they used on 9/11 was not officially available at that time.
    The guy in the video seems a little smug too.

      •
    C-JEAN (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 215
    Threads: 9
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #4
    02-04-2013, 06:27 PM
    Hi, moon fans.

    To know who else was, and maybe IS on the moon,
    read the book:
    PENETRATION
    Ingo Swann 1998. . .
    It's a PDF.

    Also, he told how venus looked like BEFORE our satellites did
    fly near it or landed on it, and send photos, before stopping. . .

    Blue skies.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked C-JEAN for this post:1 member thanked C-JEAN for this post
      • Ashim
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #5
    02-04-2013, 08:30 PM
    (02-04-2013, 02:33 AM)Guardian Wrote: I don't see the point of entertaining a moon landing conspiracy discussion. It is probably one of the least fruitful conspiracy theories out there.
    the point of the thread is not to debunk the moon landings. It's mainly about this guy's novel approach and his willingness to delve into the psychological dispositions of those who willingly maintain it was faked. How is *that* possible and what does that say about people's honesty?

      •
    BrownEye Away

    Positive Deviant
    Posts: 3,446
    Threads: 297
    Joined: Jun 2009
    #6
    02-06-2013, 08:50 PM (This post was last modified: 02-06-2013, 08:54 PM by BrownEye.)
    He implies that there were no technological secrets back then.

    Something that always bothered me about the body movements is that even their arms move slow. I would have guessed that with less gravitational resistance my arms would move much faster. I would think that my whole body would move normal if not much faster. I haven't been on the moon. Maybe gravity is the opposite of what we think, and less weight means less control of body movement.

    I do know we were on the moon, I just don't see anything logical appearing in the videos or photos.

    Really not understanding the motion/mechanics of this.



      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #7
    02-06-2013, 10:41 PM
    (02-06-2013, 08:50 PM)Pickle Wrote: I would think that my whole body would move normal if not much faster. I haven't been on the moon. Maybe gravity is the opposite of what we think, and less weight means less control of body movement.
    Opposite of what WE think? Gravity never was the main cause of restricted movement of our bodies, it's the design of our tissues - muscles, tendons. Never mind 1/6th gravity, simply look at zero G motion. It's the basically the same as on earth.

      •
    BrownEye Away

    Positive Deviant
    Posts: 3,446
    Threads: 297
    Joined: Jun 2009
    #8
    02-07-2013, 12:05 AM
    So movement would be the same, and not slow as they portray in film.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode